The council’s focus on establishing special districts stems from a need to support commercial and industrial development, crucial for the city’s economic sustainability. With a current commercial/industrial tax base of only 16-17%, the city aims to increase this to 25% to match its larger population size compared to neighboring areas like Venice and Sarasota. The proposed districts, especially in Activity Centers 6 and 10, cover over 3,600 acres and are situated around North Port’s third interchange.

The council discussed the mechanics of the proposed special districts, emphasizing that the infrastructure improvements would be financed through an assessment-based system, placing the financial burden on property owners in the affected areas rather than the broader taxpayer base. The initial phase would see the creation of a dependent district, which would transition to an independent district following state legislative approval. This would allow the city to leverage additional financing options.

Concerns were raised about the implications of creating these districts, particularly regarding the impact on existing residents in Activity Center 6 and whether their interests would be adequately represented. There was a call for careful engagement with these residents to ensure that their needs and contributions are recognized, especially for those who have already paid impact fees and may not require additional services.

The discussion also highlighted the broader implications for the city’s infrastructure, including water, sewer, and electricity services, which are important for attracting high-tech and research industries. The absence of a master plan for Activity Centers 6 and 10 was noted, with the council considering whether such a plan was necessary given existing developer commitments.

The economic development conversation also touched on the need for utility expansion and the associated costs, estimated at around $60 million. This investment is considered essential to prevent developers from looking to neighboring counties, which already have established infrastructure.

In addition to the special districts, the meeting addressed the city’s rebranding initiative, aimed at fostering a unified communication strategy and enhancing North Port’s image to attract new businesses and residents. A presentation from the communications division outlined efforts to update the city’s mission, vision, and values. This rebranding, estimated to cost $25,000, seeks to reflect community feedback and align with the city’s economic development goals.

The council also considered various options for supporting local nonprofits, including the potential rehabilitation or replacement of the community education center. With costs ranging from $2.9 million for rehabilitation to over $8 million for new construction, the council weighed the financial implications against the needs of organizations like the Northport Senior Center and Awaken Church.

Some council members expressed concern about using taxpayer funds to support nonprofit facilities. Proposals included exploring land lease agreements and potential collaborations with organizations like the Kuanas Club to maximize the use of existing city-owned properties.