The meeting began with a public hearing on the proposed 2026 budget and tax levy. Finance Director Tom Odens presented the budget, highlighting that the tax levy would remain unchanged from the previous year, despite a total increase of $954,000 due to capital improvements. The budget allocates significant portions to public safety and public works transportation.

However, residents voiced concerns about rising property taxes. Mark Dollside, a resident, noted a 16% increase in his home’s valuation and a significant rise in property taxes, which he found unjustifiable given no home improvements had been made. Another resident, Tony Wman, expressed difficulties keeping up with taxes on a fixed income, urging the council to consider budget cuts.

These concerns were echoed by Ron Christensen, who suggested that the city council should aim for a 5% budget cut to alleviate the financial burden on residents. He emphasized the need for the council to engage more openly with the community and consider the public’s sentiment in their decision-making.

The council also debated the continuation of the Director of Community Growth position. One council member described the role as a “luxury” not serving the majority of residents, advocating for budget reductions. In contrast, other members argued the importance of the position in fostering diversity and inclusion, which they view as beneficial for community cohesion. Despite these disagreements, the motion to eliminate the position failed, with six votes against and two in favor.

Discussions continued with the presentation of new bylaws by the Wilmer Municipal Utilities Commission. The commission president explained the necessity of these bylaws to improve governance and operational clarity, noting that the absence of such guidelines had previously led to chaotic transitions. The council unanimously approved the bylaws, recognizing their role in enhancing governance and accountability.

Infrastructure was another significant topic, particularly the reconstruction of Fourth Street. City engineer Jared Balden presented various design options, including a street diet and shared-use paths. The council debated the cost implications of these alternatives and the safety of cyclists and pedestrians. Ultimately, a motion was made to explore three options further, incorporating input from the bike community and residents.

The council also addressed the need to purchase wetland credits for the Highway 40 turn lane improvements project, a requirement under the Wetland Conservation Act. The purchase, necessary to mitigate environmental impacts, was approved despite concerns about the cost and the rationale behind buying existing rather than creating new wetlands.

As the meeting concluded, the council announced a gratitude lunch event planned for the community. The session ended with a closed discussion on real property matters.