The meeting further delved into financial matters, with a detailed presentation on the 2024 city audit. The city’s financial position was discussed, revealing a general fund balance of $58.9 million. Within this, $14.2 million is earmarked for future capital expenses, and $253,000 is restricted for community development, leaving $44.4 million unassigned for future spending. The audit, presented by a partner from the auditing firm, concluded with an unmodified opinion. The audit highlighted an increase in the total net position, largely due to rising revenues from new community development grants and real estate taxes. However, the general fund reported a net loss of $1 million for 2024.

Council members reviewed the budget transfer request of $645,000 from the police salary fund to purchase additional police vehicles. This was deemed necessary due to current vacancies within the department. The proposal aimed to enhance the vehicle fleet, with a focus on improving officer safety and operational reliability. The council expressed support for this transfer, emphasizing the importance of reinvesting in resources to maintain public safety.

During the public comment section, community members voiced concerns over various issues, including the need for a formalized communication process between the council and administration regarding unexpected income. Concerns were also raised about the fire department’s staffing, with one speaker suggesting that funds from unfilled positions be used for recruitment and retention. Another speaker called for transparency in the grant allocation process and questioned the rationale behind potentially adding new positions without ensuring their necessity.

Amendments to the 2026 city budget were also discussed, with a meeting scheduled for December 4th to review these amendments. The council addressed a conflict of interest ordinance, following a legal opinion highlighting inconsistencies. Amendments were suggested to align the ordinance with its intended purpose, referencing the Pennsylvania public officials and employees ethics act as guidance.

Additionally, the council discussed the potential imposition of a fee on local universities to help offset emergency service costs. This proposal was prompted by the high volume of emergency calls from these institutions, with the suggestion of a $50 per student fee to generate revenue. Legal advice was sought to determine the feasibility of implementing such a fee.