The meeting began with a closed session to discuss pending litigation involving Avalon Park Daytona LLC and Avalon Park Daytona Landholding LP versus the City of Ormond Beach and the City of Daytona Beach. The public portion resumed with the deputy city attorney addressing the commission regarding Daytona Beach resolution 2025-448. A motion to reject the settlement proposal and continue mediation was passed, with support from the majority of the commissioners. This decision underscored the city’s intent to pursue legal avenues instead of settling, reflecting ongoing tensions with Daytona Beach.

Public comments brought attention to community concerns, including remarks from Jennifer Bright regarding a substantial rate increase by Florida Power & Light (FPL). She criticized the city for profiting through franchise fees and utility taxes, urging the commission to reconsider these charges to alleviate the financial burden on residents. This financial strain formed part of a broader conversation about the city’s fiscal responsibilities and the impact of utility costs on the community.

Amber Bobac spoke about the perceived division between long-term residents and newcomers, advocating for unity and collaboration to preserve community values. She called on the commission to assert itself against state-imposed limitations on local governance, particularly in development issues. Her comments highlighted a growing sentiment among residents to maintain local control over municipal affairs.

The discussion on Avalon Park development was further expanded by Jeff Bole, who challenged prevailing beliefs about the city’s leverage over water and sewer services. He criticized the rejection of a $2.3 million offer from Daytona Beach, expressing concerns over escalating legal costs and the lack of public input on the matter.

The topic of sober living residences was another point of discussion. One commissioner voiced strong support for increasing access to these facilities, emphasizing the lack of current options in Ormond Beach compared to neighboring areas. The commissioner argued against modifying zoning laws to reduce stigma, advocating instead for educational efforts.

In response, another official shared personal experiences with addiction in their family, recognizing the symbolic nature of a dissenting vote while acknowledging the state’s requirements. The commission ultimately voted in favor of the proposed changes.

Public safety concerns were also raised during the meeting, with suggestions for more proactive measures to manage potentially disruptive individuals during sessions. A speaker proposed using city clerk’s dogs as psychological deterrents, advocating for an enhanced approach to crowd management to ensure a more orderly and respectful atmosphere.

Flooding issues in Ormond Beach, particularly in developments like Plantation Oaks and South Halifax Plantation, were highlighted by Colleen McMahon. She urged the commission to pursue legal action against Daytona Beach to protect local water resources and prevent further flooding. McMahon’s comments underscored the environmental challenges facing the city and the need for effective flood prevention measures in new developments.

The municipal airport expansion drew criticism from Marsha Blue, who questioned the financial implications and environmental impact of tree removal under the airport’s obstacle action plan. She called for transparency and public involvement in the planning process, reflecting community concerns over the airport’s expansion and its effects on local residents.

In addressing community facilities, David Juwel raised concerns about the Ormond Beach Sports Complex, currently closed due to permit issues. He questioned the status of an EPA grant received in 2014 for a pollution assessment, urging the commission to prioritize safety before advancing projects. His remarks highlighted the urgency of addressing potential environmental hazards to ensure public safety.

The meeting also covered procedural matters, including the approval of a Florida Department of Environmental Protection grant for the planning of a West Ormond Recreational and Community Center. Discussions around this project emphasized the need for proper vetting by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the importance of recreational facilities in the growing area. The debate over auto-renewal of sports agreements underscored the necessity for modernizing contracts to reflect current standards, with a consensus to seek further community input before proceeding.