The central issue revolved around Woo’s social media activity, where it was alleged that she disseminated disinformation and made comments that some community members, particularly those from the Jewish community, found divisive. One Select Board member echoed these concerns, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the commission’s credibility and its mission to promote inclusivity and unity within the community. They argued that Woo’s reappointment could undermine these goals, pointing out that the commission’s effectiveness relies on its ability to build trust and represent the diverse population of Brookline.

In contrast, another board member highlighted the importance of representation within the commission, noting that Woo was the only person of color on the CDICR. They cautioned against the implications of not reappointing Woo, particularly for the Asian community, which makes up a portion of Brookline’s demographic. This member argued that Woo’s presence on the commission is vital to ensuring diverse voices are heard in civic affairs.

The debate also touched on broader themes such as “cancel culture,” with differing views on whether the decision not to reappoint Woo constituted an unfair dismissal or a necessary action to preserve the commission’s integrity. While some board members expressed concern that Woo’s past remarks had generated significant controversy, others argued that the board should consider the broader implications of their decision, including the potential message it sends about diversity and representation.

The board’s discussion was marked by strong opinions and divisions, ultimately leading to a split vote on Woo’s reappointment. The decision not to reappoint Woo was not unanimous.

Following this contentious discussion, the board moved on to other matters, including the unanimous reappointment of Alisa Ku to the diversity commission, which proceeded without controversy.

Aside from the discussions on commission appointments, the meeting also covered updates and announcements on various community initiatives. Chair Bernard Greene highlighted the upcoming First Light celebration at Coolidge Corner, inviting residents to engage with town officials and the business community. Additionally, the board expressed gratitude to local organizations and volunteers for their efforts in providing Thanksgiving meals to those in need, emphasizing the community’s resilience amid challenges such as the temporary loss of SNAP benefits.

During the public comment segment, resident Ann Lusk addressed the board regarding the potential for a new pool in Brookline. Lusk advocated for a comprehensive study using funds from the Brookline revolving pool fund and the Brookline Community Foundation.

The board also discussed earmarks secured from the state legislature, including a $100,000 allocation for blue bike stations in Brookline. This funding, sourced from a tax increase on high earners, aims to enhance public transportation options by providing two blue bike stations with electric bikes, improving accessibility for older adults and individuals with disabilities.

Jean Woo, a candidate for the Preservation Commission, emphasized the importance of balancing historic preservation with contemporary needs. Similarly, Jason Bowers expressed his desire to give back to the community through his expertise in heritage and historic buildings.

Philip Styman, a candidate for the diversity commission, shared his background in state government and his focus on fostering connections among children and caregivers. He highlighted the importance of community engagement and the need for programs that promote belonging and equity for families in Brookline.