The meeting’s primary focus was the public hearing on National Development’s application to construct an assisted living residence. Kate Snyder from National Development introduced the project. Eric Gardner from Benchmark highlighted the demographic trends necessitating such development, noting that Natick lacks sufficient senior housing despite its significant elderly population. The proposed site, spanning approximately 8.3 acres, is positioned between residential and commercial areas, making it an ideal location for this type of facility according to the developers. The project plans to maintain an existing office building while adding the new assisted living units.

The presentation delved into the technicalities of the site, with a detailed survey of the current property layout, zoning classifications, and necessary permits. The development falls within the C2 zoning district with some areas undeveloped. Permits required include a special permit for the assisted living residence, site plan review, and compliance with the Aquifer Protection District. Numerous waivers were requested, including adjustments to building height, landscape buffers, and parking configurations, which the applicant argued would not adversely impact the surrounding residential areas.

The design of the facility was presented as one that integrates with the natural environment, featuring landscaped grounds and secure outdoor spaces for residents. The facility will operate with a comprehensive staff roster, providing services and amenities such as dining, fitness, and transportation. Concerns were addressed regarding medical waste management, emergency vehicle access, and traffic impact. A robust stormwater management system was outlined, employing low-impact development techniques to manage runoff on-site.

Community concerns were a significant component of the discussion. Residents expressed apprehensions about increased traffic, potential disturbances, and the impact on the natural landscape. Some residents proposed leaving adjacent undeveloped land untouched, valuing it as a state park extension. Others called for careful consideration of buffer zones and privacy measures, such as fencing and lighting adjustments, to minimize the project’s impact on their homes. The developers responded by proposing a six-foot fence along the property line and ensuring lighting complies with local guidelines.

Board members raised issues regarding zoning compliance, particularly concerning parking regulations in the Residential Single Family district. Traffic generation was debated, with some board members noting that assisted living facilities typically generate less traffic than other uses, though concerns remained about the study’s interpretation. Suggestions were made to adjust employee working hours to ease congestion during peak school times.

The meeting also addressed logistical challenges such as snow storage and delivery truck access, with questions about how large trucks would navigate the site. The potential use of land bank parking was discussed, with suggestions to activate the space for community use rather than leaving it underutilized. Recommendations were made to involve public amenities, such as gazebos or grills, to enhance community engagement.

Public comments included calls for preserving the existing natural habitat and maintaining neighborhood tranquility. Concerns about noise, privacy, and increased traffic were voiced, with residents advocating for a careful balance between development and community quality of life. The board acknowledged these concerns, emphasizing the importance of community input in shaping the project.