Central to the meeting was the Bloomington Ferry Road Corridor Study, presented by Phil Collins of ASA Consulting, which outlined potential redesigns for the roadway just east of Highway 169. This corridor, currently a four-lane divided road, has evolved in function over time. Presented concepts included Concept A with one-way bike lanes and sidewalks, Concept B with shared-use paths, and Concept C featuring two-way bike lanes alongside sidewalks.

The commission also addressed significant public concerns about traffic speed and pedestrian safety at crossings. Collins emphasized the study’s holistic approach to transportation improvements, noting that interim solutions would be essential before the full vision could be realized. A matrix comparing the conceptual alternatives highlighted the balance between traffic flow, pedestrian safety, and environmental sustainability. While Concepts A and C focused on dedicated bike lanes, Concept B’s shared-use path raised safety concerns due to the mix of pedestrians and faster e-bikes.

Another topic of importance was stormwater management, focusing on flooding around Land Lane and enhancing water quality through stormwater treatment basins. The commission discussed incorporating green space and improving pedestrian and bicycle mobility, with a two-way bikeway and sidewalks aligning with public feedback as a preferred alternative. Discussions of interim improvements included modifying the corridor to a single lane in each direction with strategic striping and the potential installation of a mini roundabout to address congestion.

The potential for a mini roundabout was considered in response to increased traffic from nearby I-35W construction. The commission plans to collect more data on traffic patterns before implementing permanent changes. This measured approach extends to intersections like Venus Road and Lindstrom Avenue, where curb bump-outs are proposed to improve pedestrian safety. The commission assured that interim safety improvements would integrate seamlessly into the larger project vision without requiring future removal.

Fence regulations were another focal point, with proposed updates aiming to allow greater privacy and clarify existing codes. Key discussions included increasing fence height limits in corner side yards, evaluating opacity requirements, and determining allowable materials. The commission reviewed options for fence heights, debating whether to maintain current standards or allow taller fences with specific setbacks. Concerns about visibility, especially in areas lacking stop signs, were paramount, with the commission leaning towards a flexible yet practical approach.

A proposal to eliminate the opacity requirement for front yard fences was met with mixed reactions. While some commissioners supported the change for its simplicity, others feared it might lead to undesirable yard conditions. Additionally, the commission discussed clarifying that plastic slats in chain link fences would not count towards screening requirements due to durability concerns, emphasizing the use of commercially built fencing products.

Considerations for eight-foot fences added complexity to the discussion. Current regulations allow these fences if set back from property lines, but proposed amendments aim to reduce the setback requirement. Concerns about neighborhood character and open front yards were addressed, with commissioners divided over the appropriateness of such tall fences near the street.

The meeting concluded with housekeeping items, including removing language permitting fence placement on property lines to limit city liability in boundary disputes. There was general consensus to support this change, alongside clarifying regulations for arbors and trellises.