At the forefront of the meeting was the resolution 25-1980, scrutinizing the St. Paul Police Department’s response during federal immigration enforcement activities on November 25th. The council acknowledged the community’s patience, as the resolution had been postponed for thorough consideration. The incident involved federal agents targeting community members, with local police arriving in riot gear and reportedly using tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets on observers and protestors. The council expressed concerns over police conduct, decision-making processes, and potential violations of the city’s separation ordinance, which seeks to limit local law enforcement’s involvement in federal immigration actions.

The council announced an investigation by the police’s internal integrity unit and collaboration with the Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training to ensure a review of the incident. A financial audit was also planned to assess the costs incurred during the operations. There was a call for public forums to allow community members to share their experiences and grievances, emphasizing the historical context of over-policing in communities of color and the need for de-escalation and trust-building.

A council member shared a personal account of being alerted to the incident while on maternity leave, expressing indignation over such actions occurring in spaces considered safe for families. Another member underscored the need for clear policies guiding police responses during federal operations, advocating for the safety and well-being of all community members, particularly those from immigrant backgrounds. The council collectively voiced a desire to review and potentially strengthen the separation ordinance in January.

A spokesperson addressed the climate of fear and tension related to federal immigration enforcement, citing incidents in Richfield where observers faced armed confrontations. The speaker urged community involvement in resistance efforts and called for transparency regarding police conduct during such operations. The importance of centering the experiences of communities of color in discussions and solutions was highlighted, alongside a commitment to strengthening the separation ordinance to prevent future incidents.

As the meeting progressed, the council shifted focus to the city’s legislative agenda for 2026. Discussions centered on adopting a legislative framework that aligns with both the current council’s priorities and the incoming mayoral administration. The staff was tasked with finalizing the agenda by January 21st, ahead of the legislative session. The council acknowledged a significant state budget surplus but noted challenges posed by inflation and projected shortfalls in future years. The complexities of budget negotiations and new rules affecting bonding bills were also discussed.

The council addressed several legislative priorities, including ordinance 25-4, which aimed to amend the administrative code to include Tree Preservation for city-sponsored projects. Although laid over due to absent testimonies, this ordinance was part of broader efforts to enhance city infrastructure and community well-being. Ordinance 25-72, related to the Mississippi River Critical Area and floodplain management, was approved without opposition after extensive discussion and staff work.

Further discussions revolved around ordinance 25-78, establishing quarterly reporting requirements for personnel vacancies and overtime utilization, and ordinance 25-79, intended to improve the Planning Commission process. The planning director outlined recommendations to streamline operations, enhance transparency, and increase public engagement. Proposed changes included reducing the Planning Commission’s size and modifying the early notification system for residents regarding city activities. The council expressed enthusiasm for these changes, recognizing their potential to simplify the planning process and improve public participation.

The council also addressed community engagement, particularly the need for better opportunities for public commentary. A council member expressed frustration over the handling of public participation, advocating for dedicated time for community members to voice their opinions. Plans were discussed to establish a space for open dialogue, ensuring all community members, regardless of language barriers, can express their concerns and experiences.