The meeting’s most issue centered around public comments about a property located on West Cedar. Multiple residents expressed frustration over the property’s alleged use for unauthorized business activities, including operating a landscaping business and conducting vehicle repairs in a residential area, which they claimed violated local zoning laws. A resident reported observing numerous vehicles, including trucks and vans, frequenting the property, capturing video evidence that suggested suspicious activities, such as a possible drug transaction. The resident shared feelings of insecurity, noting that their spouse was concerned about the frequent visitors.

Despite the residents’ concerns and evidence provided, such as advertisements for boarding rooms at the property, they expressed disappointment with the borough’s response, or lack thereof. One resident remarked on the absence of fines or formal action, highlighting that they had sent multiple communications to the council without seeing records of any enforcement measures. “I think we can surmise various things happening from video and stuff like that, but there’s actual evidence in our advertisements,” the resident stated, questioning the borough’s inaction.

However, they noted limitations in enforcement if no laws were technically being violated, saying, “I don’t know that they are doing anything illegal.” Despite this, the council member expressed appreciation for the residents’ vigilance, which had resulted in regular updates on the matter.

The discussion revealed underlying tension between the enforcement of zoning regulations and the balance between property rights and community safety. Residents pressed for more decisive action, urging the council to adopt measures such as fines or court appearances to deter ongoing violations. Meanwhile, council members navigated the challenge of operating within legal frameworks without overstepping their authority.

Another topic of interest was the proposed cannabis dispensary at the location of a local dry cleaner. A resident inquired about the status of the proposal, to which a council member responded that there was no new information beyond the initial proposal. Concerns were raised about the location’s inadequate parking, with the council member expressing a preference for economic development opportunities on the west end, should the dispensary project move forward.

In other business, the council discussed Ordinance 2514 concerning fees for solar installations. The ordinance was presented without public commentary and swiftly adopted following a unanimous vote. The engineer provided updates on ongoing projects, noting the substantial completion of Phase One and plans for fiscal year 2026 to be presented in January. Collaboration with Mr. Galloway on recreational community center improvements was also highlighted, with potential funding from a LIA grant being considered. Additionally, the Shade Tree Commission procured 44 new trees for planting, addressing concerns about informing property owners and the need for a formal adoption process to ensure proper tree care.

The Department of Public Works reported minor equipment issues and a heating problem at the community center, which were being managed. The police department noted a busy November with 425 recorded incidents, including traffic stops and park enforcement. Training efforts were emphasized, with half of the department participating in active shooter drills. Officer John was announced to be leaving for another opportunity, with recognition of his contributions to the community.

New business included several resolutions, such as a special revenue resolution and a shared service agreement for the chief financial officer. Discussions arose regarding a resolution related to Verizon Wireless and the installation of devices on existing poles, with concerns about regulatory compliance prompting suggestions for language amendments.