The council’s opposition to Senate Bill 4736 was a focal point of the meeting, with members expressing concern over its potential to undermine local control over land use and density issues. The resolution opposing the bill was passed unanimously. The bill is seen as an “egregious assault on municipal autonomy,” and the council’s unified stance was framed as a defense of responsible development practices that align with community values. The council emphasized the importance of municipal governance in ensuring that development remains sustainable and aligned with local needs.

In parallel with their opposition to the state bill, the council took substantial steps to strengthen the borough’s affordable housing efforts. They approved a resolution directing $200,000 from the sale of 319 Lorraine Avenue to the affordable housing trust fund. This move aims to address a historical gap in funding for affordable housing in the area. The funds are expected to impact ongoing negotiations with the town’s planner for a ten-year affordable housing plan. The establishment of the trust fund marks a milestone for the borough, with development fees and contributions like this helping to ensure future housing needs are met. The council reported that approximately $60,000 has already been collected in the fund’s first year, with projections suggesting it could reach nearly $300,000 by year-end.

The meeting also saw a recognition of Councilman John Weber’s nine years of service, set to conclude at the end of December 2025. Acknowledged for his dedication to environmental initiatives and local governance, Weber was presented with a signed map of Bradley Beach as a token of appreciation. His influence on encouraging civic participation and his efforts in various borough commissions were highlighted, underscoring his lasting impact on the community.

Public participation was robust, with residents voicing concerns and suggestions on various topics. One resident, J. Coan, expressed approval of the allocation from the church sale proceeds to the affordable housing trust fund, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to state guidelines. Coan also raised concerns about the broader implications of Senate Bill 4736, urging the council and residents to advocate against it to state legislators. Another resident, Linda Duffy, questioned the recent decision to adjust council meeting times from 6:30 PM to 5:30 PM, citing potential exclusion of residents who commute. The council recognized the potential impact of this change and expressed willingness to reassess the decision if it proved inconvenient for the public.

The council addressed the financial implications of recent property sales, specifically the net proceeds of approximately $2.7 million from the church property sale. This financial windfall prompted discussions on the appropriate allocation of funds, with some council members advocating for a more significant commitment to affordable housing. The proposal to allocate $200,000 was seen as a strong commitment, although some residents and officials suggested higher contributions.

In other business, the council approved a simplification of the beach locker rental fee structure. The new system introduces a single annual rental fee of $250, designed to streamline accounting and provide clearer financial forecasting, addressing historical disparities in charges for new and existing renters.

The meeting also included discussions on various other resolutions and ordinances, such as the bond ordinance related to sewer pump station improvements, which required an increase in the original bonding amount due to higher than anticipated bids. The council expressed confidence in managing these infrastructure projects, with bids for the sewer pump station expected soon.

Additionally, the council considered changes to the special parking permits ordinance, opting to extend current permits until February 28, 2026, to allow for further discussion on proposed changes. They also passed a resolution opposing the relocation of Mammoth Medical Center Hospital, citing concerns over the impact on healthcare access and the community’s tax base.