The board’s discussion centered on the need for a examination of the impact that increased wastewater flow could have on the existing sewer system. A participant stressed the importance of documenting current conditions and understanding the potential effects of additional flow, stating, “the neighbors have a right to have a concern about the added flow in the capacity.” This sentiment was echoed by others who acknowledged that the neighborhood’s historical issues with flooding and sewage required careful consideration. The urgency of addressing these concerns was underscored by the looming deadline for filing with the state, increasing the pressure to resolve outstanding issues expediently.

Particularly concerning was the condition of a critical culvert and a questionable tie-in point for the sewer system on Pine Street, which was described as flat and potentially insufficient for handling increased flow. Despite modifications by the developer to relocate the tie-in to a more favorable slope, board members called for more accurate local data to assess the existing system’s capacity and the projected impact of the development. The importance of transparency and thoroughness in the review process was highlighted, with a board member asserting the need for comprehensive answers to the peer review’s concerns before proceeding with the permit process.

The project’s water infrastructure also came under scrutiny. A town official noted that breaks in the main had previously occurred.

In light of these challenges, the board discussed the potential for conditioning permits to ensure necessary infrastructure improvements are completed as part of the project. The project’s engineer, Jacob Lemieux, acknowledged the board’s desire for assurance regarding the culvert design, proposing that the replacement be conditioned within the permit process. However, the board expressed concern that incomplete assessments could lead to issues down the line.

The role of peer review in the permitting process was another focal point. A participant expressed frustration over the inability to conduct a second peer review, emphasizing that neighbors deserve clarity and thorough responses to peer review concerns. While an attorney for the applicant acknowledged the necessity of resolving these issues, he pointed out that conditions imposed by the board would require voluntary compliance from the developer, as they lack enforceability otherwise.

Further discussions highlighted the need for a sewer capacity study to determine the feasibility of the project within the current infrastructure limitations. The board discussed the importance of starting this study promptly, recognizing that it would take approximately six weeks to complete. This process would involve assessing historical usage data from past tenants, such as the VFW and a garage, to better understand existing capacity and flows.

Participants emphasized the importance of ensuring that the new development does not exceed existing sewer capacity, with a commitment to further studies to verify the system’s capabilities.