The variance request for 1160 8th Street East drew attention as it dealt with the construction of external staircases needed to elevate the structure to meet current flood elevation standards. The property, originally built in 1961, had been damaged in the 2024 hurricanes and required elevation to a compliant height of 16.5 feet. Stacy Van Meter, the property applicant, presented the case, detailing efforts to minimize the project’s impact on property lines. The proposed variances included a front setback encroachment of 11.8 feet and a side encroachment of 3.2 feet to accommodate necessary stairways.

The commission’s discussion emphasized the need for competent, substantial evidence to support the variance, avoiding reliance on opinions or speculation. Braden Evans, the principal planner, provided a detailed overview, noting the current setbacks and justifying the variance based on unique property circumstances. The necessity of ensuring the variance applied only to the staircase and not future constructions was a key point.

A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to the broader implications of zoning regulations, particularly how they affect development and community standards. The commission addressed concerns over vacant lots, notably the Thunderbird property, and the economic impact of stagnant development. Discussions included potential zoning amendments to increase density limits from 22 to 60 units per acre, aligning with the comprehensive plan to spur development in the central business district.

Debates also emerged around proposed amendments to allow encroachments for HVAC units and meter platforms within setbacks, driven by Duke Energy’s requirements. The commission acknowledged the challenges these requirements posed, particularly concerning safety and accessibility, and discussed potential design innovations to reconcile these with existing regulations.

A proposal to table further discussions on these amendments was supported, with members advocating for a review of successful properties that had integrated such requirements without infringing on setbacks.

Further discussions centered on zoning changes for the “Green Leaf” property and the AR Resort Facilities High 50 district. The commission considered a previous resolution. Concerns about building heights and zero setbacks were raised, with comparisons to St. Pete Beach’s redevelopment highlighting the potential benefits of revitalizing Treasure Island’s amenities and business environment.

The commission emphasized the need for clear, data-supported proposals to ensure any changes met community needs and supported economic growth.