The commission’s decision came after discussions regarding the building’s role in the university’s history and its architectural contributions. Proponents for the building’s designation highlighted its significance as the first dormitory for single women on campus and its embodiment of postwar cultural and social trends. They argued that Eaton Residential College represents a shift in the architectural identity of the University of Miami, aligning with postwar needs for student accommodation and reflecting broader historical narratives of Coral Gables’ development.

Bonnie Bolton, who introduced the case, emphasized the architectural importance and historical significance of the building, noting its mid-century modern style and influence on subsequent dormitory designs at the university. The urgency of the building’s preservation was underscored by the potential for its demolition, which preservationists argued would erase a vital piece of the campus’s architectural narrative.

In contrast, representatives from the University of Miami, including Jeffrey Bass, contended that the building did not meet the necessary criteria for historic designation. They cited the university’s pressing need to expand modern housing stock for a growing student population, arguing that the building’s removal was essential for the institution’s development goals. Bass pointed out that the appeal for designation lacked substantial evidence of the building’s historical or architectural significance, emphasizing that the university’s property rights should not be compromised.

The commission’s deliberations also touched on the procedural aspects of the appeal, including questions about standing and the applicability of local and national designation criteria. Despite the preservation community’s efforts, the commission ultimately voted to reject the designation, with some members expressing a desire for a more unified approach to historic preservation that aligns with the university’s broader development plans.

Concurrent to the Eaton College discussion, the commission also addressed the local historic designation of a property on Navari Avenue, built in 1924 and recognized for its Mission Revival style. The property, associated with architect H. George, was unanimously approved for historic designation, underscoring its significance within the historical landscape of Coral Gables. The designation process highlighted the contributions of landscape architect Craig Button and the foundational development efforts by George Merrick, which shaped the city’s architectural identity.

Additionally, the commission considered the historic designation of a property on Ortega Avenue, designed by H. George Frink in the Mediterranean Revival style. The discussion revealed concerns about alterations made to the property over the years, with board members debating whether these changes compromised its historical integrity. Despite differing views on the impact of modifications, the board ultimately approved the designation, emphasizing the property’s association with Frink and its historical context.

The meeting also included a proposal to rebuild rain shelters at the Granada Golf Course, with a focus on incorporating ADA-compliant features. The commission approved the design for six new rain shelters, two of which would be ADA compliant, and considered the restoration of an existing shelter if feasible.