Several council members voiced their opposition, framing their dissent as a protest against state intervention in local matters. They argued that the ADU initiative could disproportionately benefit predatory landlords and outside developers, rather than serving the working-class residents of Greenfield. One council member questioned the overall efficacy of ADUs, suggesting that the cost of building such units is often prohibitive for local families, thus limiting their potential impact on the housing crisis.

Despite the vocal opposition, the amendments are necessary to align the city’s regulations with state law. Proponents of the changes emphasized the importance of compliance and the potential for ADUs to contribute to the housing stock, albeit modestly. They acknowledged the limited number of ADUs likely to be built but stressed the need to explore varied solutions to the housing shortage.

In other council actions, the meeting saw unanimous decisions to declare two city-owned properties, located on Meridian Street and Petty Plane Road, as surplus. These properties are now authorized for sale or lease, with the mayor entrusted to execute the necessary transactions.