The board’s dedicated discussion on the debt exclusion centered around its temporary nature, clarifying that it would not permanently increase the town’s budget, unlike an override. Recognizing the potential for voter confusion, the board agreed on the need for a proactive public education campaign. Plans were made to develop a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation to demystify the debt exclusion and its implications. To reinforce this effort, the board suggested mailing information postcards to residents well in advance, ensuring they reach voters, particularly those who vote by mail, at least one month before the election. This strategy aims to maximize voter awareness and engagement, providing ample time for residents to address any queries or concerns.

Additionally, the meeting revealed pressing budgetary issues, including a focus on the upcoming fiscal year 27 budget. The board acknowledged the rising health insurance costs affecting neighboring communities, prompting a closer examination of the town’s financial obligations and the impact of debt service on budget flexibility. Despite these challenges, the board recognized the current budget’s satisfactory performance but remained cautious about future uncertainties.

A potential increase in trash bag fees was proposed as a revenue-generating measure, estimated to bring in an additional $15,000. This proposal was part of a broader discussion on financial strategies to navigate the town’s fiscal landscape, with an emphasis on maintaining budgetary balance amid growing financial obligations.

Further complicating the financial outlook was the need to understand new growth projections, anticipated to be around $250,000. The board acknowledged these projections’ potential impact on financial planning, particularly in light of the complex debt service burden that restricts budget flexibility.

The board also discussed the levy limit for taxes, clarifying its definition as the maximum amount the town can raise and appropriate for taxes, with an annual increase cap of two and a half percent. A comparison of fiscal years 2027 and 2028 revealed a decline in the levy limit, from approximately $23.476 million to $24.313 million, sparking a need for further clarity on this decrease.

The board addressed the contentious issue of cost of living adjustments for non-union employees. Traditionally set at a two and a half percent increase, the board debated the appropriateness of this practice given potential budget constraints. Concerns were raised about the timing of discussing raises so early in the budget process, with calls for a more comprehensive review of departmental budget sheets to better understand financial needs. Ultimately, the board decided to table the decision on non-union employee raises until more information becomes available, allowing for adjustments based on the evolving financial landscape.

In other business, the board reviewed and approved annual liquor license renewals and addressed an annual fuel storage permit for underground storage at gas stations. Additionally, the board acknowledged the resignation of Robert Adams, Sr., from the fire station building committee, expressing gratitude for his contributions to the town.