The meeting opened with public comments that highlighted the community’s growing discontent over noise pollution stemming from airport operations. Jeff Order, a concerned resident, addressed the council with detailed observations about the increased noise since renovations on a nearby golf course led to the removal of trees that previously dampened sound. Order argued that the airport was not complying with FAA noise level mandates and criticized the proposed Voluntary Corrective Action Plan (VCAP) for potentially worsening the situation. He advocated for the planting of Clusia and Podocarpus plants as a natural barrier to reduce noise by over 40%, emphasizing the health risks of prolonged exposure to high noise levels.

Diane Curelli, another resident from Parakeet Lane, shared her personal struggles with noise from the airport, particularly from jumbo jets, which had rendered outdoor activities like swimming and hosting gatherings unbearable. Curelli also underscored the financial burden of soundproofing windows, which proved ineffective against outdoor noise, and the subsequent impact on property values. Both speakers called for immediate action, stressing the health implications of the noise pollution.

Council members responded to these concerns with varying degrees of engagement. One council member expressed support for planting additional bushes on the golf course side, recognizing Order’s expertise and advocating for further exploration of his proposal. Another member, although not residing near the airport, acknowledged the noticeable noise and agreed on the need for remediation. The council discussed who should be responsible for addressing these concerns, with an administrator clarifying that the airport would be contacted for compliance, and the parks department would assist in identifying suitable vegetation for noise mitigation.

The discussion then shifted to the approval of the airport’s Voluntary Corrective Action Plan, a response to a complaint filed under 14 CFR part 13 to the FAA. The complaint, related to non-aeronautical use of airport property, required the submission of a corrective action plan to address the allegations. The council deliberated on the origins of the complaint, with one member expressing frustration over the FAA’s influence on airport operations and questioning Dahare Air’s compliance regarding aeronautical use of property. Despite a reported $2 million investment by Dahare to transition to aeronautical use, the council member noted this transition had not yet occurred.

The meeting continued with discussions about compliance with FAA requirements and the management of non-aeronautical uses at the airport. Concerns were raised about procedural adherence, particularly in light of complaints filed under FAA regulations. An unidentified participant expressed frustration, describing the situation as a “terrible position” and emphasizing a commitment to accountability. They underscored the need for proper negotiation with the FAA, although the meeting was not intended for such discussions.

Another participant noted the procedural nature of the discussions and reiterated the seriousness of addressing FAA compliance. They expressed confidence in the airport’s management despite acknowledging past challenges, stating that the current situation required a focused approach to resolve ongoing issues. Concerns about management performance were voiced, with a participant expressing a lack of confidence and seeking to be appointed as the board’s liaison with the FAA, drawing on past experience in similar negotiations. This motion was seconded and passed unanimously.

In a dramatic moment, a speaker made strong allegations about the airport’s operations, claiming that “runway 1230 was illegally extended” and criticizing the airport’s catering to external influences. They urged the council to prioritize local interests and reminded leaders of their duty to represent Martin County residents.