The bylaws discussion was the main highlight of the meeting, as council members deliberated over the agenda-setting process for executive sessions and special meetings. This debate centered on the mayor’s and council president’s roles, with differing opinions on whether the mayor should have unilateral power to propose agenda items. A proposal was made to allow the mayor to place certain resolutions related to contracts on the agenda without requiring council approval, a move aimed at balancing power between the mayor and the council. The debate underscored a broader issue of authority and collaboration within the borough’s government.

One council member suggested that the agenda-setting process should be a collaborative effort between the mayor and the council president. They emphasized that the changes to the bylaws should facilitate cooperation, stating, “If we have the opportunity to modify it and jointly come together… you have to work together and collaborate.” Despite this call for collaboration, another council member argued that the existing language sufficiently aligns with statutory requirements, emphasizing that the council president should have the authority to set the agenda while acknowledging the mayor’s input.

As the discussion progressed, it became apparent that the changes to the bylaws had shifted power dynamics, with some members expressing concern over the potential loss of collaborative governance. A suggestion was made to accept the current bylaws but retain the option to amend them in future meetings, highlighting a willingness to engage in dialogue and adjustments as necessary. This approach was met with resistance from some members who felt the current system worked effectively.

The bylaws debate culminated in a vote on Resolution 26-4, which revealed a split among the council members. Councilmen Bole and Perno voted against it, while Councilmen Marorrow, Piper, and Scarice voted in favor, leading to the resolution’s passage.

Following the contentious bylaws discussion, the meeting transitioned to a ceremonial segment where newly elected council members were sworn in. Due to a scheduling conflict, the oath of office was administered by the borough clerk, with a ceremonial swearing-in conducted by a senator present at the meeting. The senator acknowledged the council’s efforts in maintaining stability and emphasized a commitment to partnership with the borough.

In addition to the bylaws and swearing-in ceremony, the meeting addressed community concerns, notably parking issues at the senior center. A resident voiced dissatisfaction with recent modifications that had adversely affected accessibility, particularly for individuals with mobility aids. A council member acknowledged that the repainting project was not executed correctly, and an engineer would assess the situation to ensure appropriate corrections.

Another resident, Plet Drogan, spoke about an upcoming gala organized by the Kenilworth American Revolution 250 committee. Drogan encouraged council participation and broader community support for the event, highlighting its significance in celebrating the borough’s history. The gala is set to take place on January 29 and features a five-course meal and live music, with tickets available for purchase.

Despite earlier tensions, the meeting also included moments of camaraderie among council members, with light-hearted exchanges and expressions of gratitude for community support in re-elections. The meeting concluded with a benediction from Father Giovani Rizzo, emphasizing unity and humility in serving the community.