The ANR plan, presented by Greg Roy of Dillson Roy, included 35 lots, with some requiring reduced frontage. Roy proposed solutions to address historical street area takings and formalize access via Fire Road 15. However, concerns arose regarding the road’s condition, which one board member described as “too steep, too narrow, and has no real suitable material.” They emphasized that the road’s current status, not potential improvements, must guide the board’s evaluation.

A letter from the fire chief highlighted the road’s hazards, particularly with increased traffic from new development. Members shared personal observations of the road’s challenges, such as icy conditions and difficulty in navigating the unimproved sections. The board member’s experience with a front-wheel-drive vehicle, unable to traverse the icy road, reinforced concerns about accessibility and safety.

A legal debate ensued over whether Fire Road 15 could be deemed adequate for ANR approval. The board pondered the requirements under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 41, Section 81L, which could affect whether the road constitutes legal frontage. A member suggested that the road’s inadequacy could lead to denying the ANR application unless improvements are made, potentially necessitating a formal subdivision process.

The applicant, represented by Benjamin Builderson, acknowledged the board’s concerns and expressed willingness to consider improvements, such as widening or paving Fire Road 15. However, board members expressed reservations about endorsing conditional improvements, highlighting potential stormwater permit issues that could arise with such modifications. The complexities of transitioning from seasonal camp roads to permanent residential access were noted, given the historical use of these roads dating back decades.

Ultimately, the board chose not to endorse the current ANR plan, allowing for a fee waiver if a revised plan is submitted within six months. This decision was driven by the determination that Fire Road 15, as it stands, could not safely support the proposed increase in homes. The board’s focus remained on ensuring any development adheres to safety standards and municipal service accessibility.

In other business, the board addressed a scenic road application for a property on Northfield Road, involving the removal of a stone wall section and two white pine trees. Concerns about the trees’ health prompted the board to seek input from the town’s tree warden. The board also discussed procedural matters related to the ANR process and approved a motion to continue discussions on several agenda items, including Zero Reservoir Road and Summer Street, to a later date.

Additionally, updates were provided on a battery energy storage system project, with construction anticipated to commence in August and operational by October. Discussions included the master plan draft, committee reports, and logistical scheduling for future meetings.