The meeting opened with public comments revealing widespread opposition to the proposed high and dry boat storage facility. Residents argued that the large, three-story structure was incompatible with the residential zoning of the area, which had already reached its maximum density. Concerns were raised about communications regarding the project being conducted outside the formal review process, with updates shared selectively among officials. Critics pointed to the exclusion of key figures, such as the economic development director, from these discussions. The vice mayor’s request to exclude the property from the city’s proposed master planning process was particularly contentious.

Amid these concerns, some residents emphasized the importance of adhering to established processes to maintain public trust. Calls were made for a more transparent and inclusive approach, with a focus on ensuring that development aligns with the community’s interests. The discourse highlighted a need for collaboration between the commission, developers, and residents to address the city’s development challenges effectively.

In response to these tensions, discussions turned to the broader regulatory environment affecting development in Treasure Island. Residents and commissioners alike acknowledged the necessity of a master plan to guide future projects and ensure responsible growth. The commission explored the potential benefits of Planned Developments (PDs) as a tool for fostering flexibility and incentives for developers, emphasizing that such frameworks are common in other municipalities across the county.

The debate over PDs underscored a broader desire for clarity and strategic planning. While some commissioners supported the implementation of PDs, others stressed the importance of completing a master plan first. It was argued that a planning framework would provide a foundation for PDs.

Public comments further revealed frustration over perceived divisions within the community regarding development. Some speakers argued against labeling individuals as “anti-development,” noting that many residents support responsible growth but are concerned about proposed density limits. Calls were made for a master plan to guide development and ensure that any increases in density are justified by data.

The meeting also addressed concerns about the handling of the Treasure Island Yacht Club property and its potential redevelopment. Discussions focused on the need for improved communication and transparency regarding private property developments, with a commissioner emphasizing that the city is not responsible for informing the public about projects that have not yet applied for permits.

In addition to development discussions, the commission tackled other topics, including the procurement of a new vehicle for public works and updates on various community initiatives. The decision to purchase a 250 truck, deemed necessary for disaster recovery efforts, received unanimous approval. The commission also unanimously passed several ordinances related to land development regulations, including the adoption of a new drainage manual to replace the previous terrain modification manual.

Community engagement initiatives featured prominently in the discussions, with updates on upcoming events and efforts to enhance local amenities. Concerns were raised about the lack of shade in Roselli Park, prompting a commitment to explore grant opportunities for installing sun shades. The commission also discussed the importance of improving parking access for events following feedback from the recent kite festival.