Another focal point of the meeting was the master plan steering committee, aimed at updating the town’s master plan, last revised in 1999. The committee seeks to involve planners, engineers, and community members, with applications opening in February. Its role will be pivotal in shaping a request for proposal (RFP) for hiring a planning firm, intended to save time and approximately $50,000 by conducting initial public engagement. The structure of the committee includes an executive group responsible for engaging a broad spectrum of community voices. The steering committee’s work is intended to prepare for a more effective master planning process, with discussions around its size, composition, and the inclusion of expertise in areas like affordable housing and sustainability.

The allocation of $2.5 million from a recreation bond for Night Park developments was another topic of discussion. Clarity was sought on how these funds will be allocated, with emphasis on a collaborative approach involving schools, the park board, and other stakeholders. The formation of a new committee to oversee Night Park improvements was proposed, with representatives from the school district, borough, and Department of Public Works. This committee aims to make recommendations for fund allocation by the end of the year.

In the realm of community arts, the reestablishment of the College of Civic Arts and Design Council was discussed. This advisory committee aims to foster partnerships and empower local artists without a budget, distinguishing between advisory and formal committees. Additionally, a public art committee is planned to facilitate the integration of public art, like murals, within the community. This committee will issue an RFP for mural applications, and its operations will be managed through the borough’s business improvement district (BID).

Safety concerns were also addressed, with a Department of Transportation report on school drop-off and pickup safety. Participants stressed the importance of transparency and categorizing recommendations by difficulty to prioritize actions. A public forum for discussing these recommendations was proposed to engage the community and manage expectations regarding funding limitations.

Lastly, the meeting touched on redevelopment matters, specifically a project on a property that housed a former bank. Concerns about the redevelopment agreement and the involvement of the historic commission were discussed, with a desire to ensure that all necessary documentation and stakeholder input are considered before finalizing agreements.