Economic Development Director Meredith Mooney presented the recommendations stemming from the Chestnut Hill commercial area study. The study, rooted in the 2005 comprehensive plan, identified Chestnut Hill as “Gateway West” but noted its failure to reach its potential compared to other Brookline areas like Coolidge Corner. The plan focuses on two primary objectives: incentivizing significant net new commercial tax growth and enhancing the livability and identity of the area. Proposed zoning changes include a mix of transit-oriented and neighborhood mixed-use areas, emphasizing ground floor retail with residential spaces above. These changes aim to create a bustling commercial district that caters to community needs while generating substantial tax revenue.

One key aspect of the proposal involves increasing the maximum building heights to 88 feet in the commercial three district, with potential for up to 150 feet in the 4.0 district if certain commercial use requirements are met. This approach raised concerns among community members, given the current one- and two-story building landscape. The necessity of public hearings to gather community feedback was stressed, as the proposal would require a two-thirds vote at town meeting to pass.

During the session, discussions highlighted the balance needed between commercial and residential development. Concerns were voiced about the potential for increased traffic congestion and the overall impact on the town’s character. The Economic Development Advisory Board has been involved in extensive meetings to provide expertise on economic viability, recommending a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of four, designed to accommodate sufficient commercial development while considering other zoning benefits like open space and setbacks.

The meeting also touched on negotiations with City Realty, the new owner of the Chestnut Hill office park. Their redevelopment proposal includes 420,000 square feet of commercial space, a 200-room hotel, medical offices, and approximately 250 residential units. This development is projected to yield significant commercial tax growth, with anticipated public benefits totaling $24 million, including contributions to infrastructure improvements and affordable housing.

Amidst the zoning discussions, the board acknowledged the necessity of engaging with neighboring Newton’s planning department due to the proposal’s proximity to their borders. Ensuring transparency and collaboration with Newton is seen as important to avoid potential conflicts and misunderstandings.

In addition to the zoning proposal, the board covered other topics, such as the impact of odor issues from local operations. Temporary measures to alleviate the unpleasant aromas affecting neighbors are being explored, with urgency expressed to address the matter promptly.

The board also discussed the introduction of a new software system for the police department. Concerns were raised about the software’s perceived nature as generative AI, with clarifications provided that it is designed to synthesize existing policy material for police officers’ reference. The proposal’s implications for policing and community concerns about surveillance were acknowledged, with a call for further review by the Police Commissioner’s Advisory Committee before proceeding.

The meeting progressed to address the Black History Month proclamation, emphasizing the importance of preserving Black Americans’ narratives against efforts to erase or rewrite history. The board urged the community to engage in activities honoring Black History Month and to recognize the intertwined history of all Americans.

In closing, the Select Board discussed the need for additional public engagement regarding the Center Street lot redevelopment. The board emphasized the importance of gathering comprehensive feedback from various advisory boards and community members before advancing the proposal. Concerns about the economic viability of the sidelot project were raised, highlighting the need for examination and consensus-building efforts.