The most debated topic was the denial of a zoning variance appeal for a proposed 10-foot fence between a service parking facility and public roadways. The Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) had previously denied the variance, arguing that the fence would not align with the zoning code’s goals for aesthetics and community welfare. The council member reviewing the BZA’s decision highlighted concerns that the fence would create a fortress-like presence, negatively impacting neighborhood character and contradicting urban design goals. While the fence was intended to enhance security, the council member suggested exploring alternative solutions that would not compromise the area’s character.

A differing perspective emerged from another council member, who questioned the BZA’s findings and procedural discussions, asserting that the concerns raised were not well-grounded in land use principles. This member argued that with proper landscaping, the fence could potentially meet the required standards for approval. Despite this contention, the council voted five to one in favor of denying the variance, effectively preventing the construction of the proposed fence.

The council also adopted a new ordinance amendment requiring law enforcement officers to conduct operations without masks or facial coverings, with limited exceptions. This measure aims to rebuild trust and ensure public safety by allowing residents to easily identify officers.

The proposed system intends to cool approximately 850 multifamily housing units and various facilities using groundwater-based technology. This initiative seeks to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and lower emissions related to energy transportation and waste. The franchise agreement is expected to span 20 years, with a starting energy supply rate of 5%. Council members acknowledged the efforts of community leaders and the Port Authority in promoting this energy system.

In addressing the rise of TNCs, the council considered an ordinance amendment to implement a tiered license fee structure for companies like Uber and Lyft. The proposed structure consists of three tiers based on the number of drivers employed by a TNC. The council noted that while the fees would not cover all costs, they would contribute to staffing and operational expenses. The tiered system was preferred over a flat fee, aligning with feedback from TNCs and setting St. Paul’s fees higher than Minneapolis but lower than other areas.

The council also engaged in discussions regarding drive-thru businesses, with representatives from District Council 9 advocating for a moratorium on new drive-thrus requiring conditional use permits. This stance stems from concerns about car-centric planning and the desire to create denser, walkable neighborhoods. The council was urged to consider the economic implications of drive-thrus, noting that such businesses often yield lower tax revenues compared to community-oriented establishments. A comparison to Minneapolis, which banned new drive-thrus in 2019, was made, highlighting the positive effects on housing and business development. The public hearing on this matter will continue on February 25.

Other resolutions addressed during the meeting included the authorization of fire training exercises, amendments to the Parks and Recreation Department’s financing plans, and a proposal for the establishment of the Ferry Santos Act tax increment financing (TIF) district. The latter aims to redevelop the former Saint Joseph Hospital site, which has been largely vacant since 2020. The proposed TIF district would capture future property tax increases resulting from redevelopment, potentially generating significant tax revenue for the city.