The Frankens’ application was the centerpiece of the meeting, drawing attention due to its scope and the variances required for the proposed renovations. Located in the C6 zoning district and the Harbor overlay district, the property features both a single-family home and a semi-detached dwelling, a condition that prompted a request for a D2 variance to expand the non-conforming use. The renovations proposed by the Frankens included maintaining the existing footprint of the single-family home with the addition of a new rear porch, while ensuring compliance with height regulations and floor area ratios. The plans required several bulk variances related to front and side yard setbacks.

John Hal Bruner, the project architect and engineer, provided detailed insights into the property’s existing conditions, describing it as a corner lot featuring a modest architectural style. The single-family home, built approximately 85 years ago, exhibited significant structural issues, including framing rot and a lack of a proper foundation. The proposed renovations aimed to address these deficiencies while maintaining the property’s historical charm. Bruner highlighted the introduction of a stormwater management system to mitigate runoff and emphasized that the project would not increase the number of bedrooms or living intensity.

Community members expressed strong support for the Frankens’ plans during the public comment segment. Residents such as Stacy Nichols and Robert Krill praised the renovations, noting the positive aesthetic impact on the neighborhood. Lee Scott and Philip Rogers echoed these sentiments, referencing the property’s previous dilapidated state and applauding the Frankens’ commitment to restoring its condition. The board took these comments into account, underscoring that no negative testimony had been presented against the application.

The board’s approval of the variances was contingent upon compliance with affordable housing regulations and submission of revised plans for review. The decision was unanimous.

In addition to the Frankens’ application, the board also considered a variance request from Kate May Contracting concerning an expanded deck on New York Avenue. This application involved alterations to an existing deck, including the conversion of stairs into a deck extension with a grill. The board examined compliance issues related to proximity to a garage and assessed the variance request under C1 and C2 criteria.

Miss Amy, the architect for the project, clarified the variance’s necessity due to the deck’s proximity to the garage and the property’s shape. She emphasized that the renovations adhered to the existing footprint, maintaining a balance between maximizing usable space and meeting zoning requirements. The board acknowledged the complexities involved in the application and ultimately granted the variance, subject to specific waivers and conditions.

The approval of the Frankens’ application, in particular, highlighted the importance of community involvement and the board’s role in facilitating projects that enhance neighborhood character while adhering to regulatory frameworks.