The most notable topic of the evening was the discussion surrounding the splash pad fencing. Revisiting a topic from the previous meeting, the commission delved into whether to install a permanent fence around the splash pad, with the primary concern being child safety due to the adjacent parking lot. One member argued that a fence was essential, citing feedback from families who previously appreciated a temporary fence. They emphasized the importance of making the splash pad a safe environment, stating, “The parking lot literally butts almost right up to the splash pad,” underscoring the urgency of the issue.

Another member supported the installation of a fence, understanding the concerns from parents about safety in environments with water and slippery surfaces, despite no longer having young children themselves. Conversely, an opposing viewpoint emerged with a suggestion to use landscaping, such as strategically placed rocks and plantings, to create a natural boundary that would not compromise the aesthetic goals initially envisioned for the splash pad.

The commission agreed on the importance of balancing safety with aesthetics. One creative proposal was to explore an architectural fence that could be both visually appealing and functional, incorporating elements like a curved top or decorative features, and enhanced with shrubs or solar lights. Estimates for different styles of fencing ranged from $20,000 to $25,000, prompting a consensus to gather more information on options and costs before making a final decision. The commission considered a phased approach to implementation, potentially incorporating additional landscaping or features in subsequent years.

In parallel with the splash pad fencing discussion, the commission also considered updates on local trail projects, specifically the DNR local trail connection project. The proposal involved upgrading an existing trail section on the north side to meet grant requirements by widening it from eight feet to ten feet. The city engineer presented a mockup of the changes, which would require easement agreements from two property owners to facilitate connection to the Dakota Rail Trail. Despite signs of “alligator cracking” and aging, the trail was considered walkable, and the consensus was to prioritize other capital improvement projects over immediate trail reconstruction.

The commission debated various capital improvement priorities, including park benches, splash pad fencing, and trail lighting in the Old Schoolhouse area, given the park board’s $100,000 budget for the year. Members expressed a preference for addressing smaller, immediate improvements over the trail reconstruction, which could be postponed. The potential for future trail connections to downtown was noted, recognizing a need for safer pathways for residents.

Attention also turned to the upcoming Mayor Rising Community Festival, scheduled for July 11th. Plans included maintaining the car show schedule and extending craft shows and children’s activities. Questions arose about the timing and location of musical performances, to be organized primarily by the fire department relief association. The commission contemplated potential sponsorship for a tournament during the festival, with ideas for various events such as a kids’ baseball tournament and a bean bag toss. Concerns about the balance of children’s and adult activities were raised, with participants agreeing on the need for more adult-oriented events.

The logistics of managing tournaments were discussed, highlighting the necessity for an organized structure to ensure successful execution. Community involvement was deemed vital, with suggestions to engage residents through social media to recruit volunteers and gauge interest in potential activities. The idea of a dodgeball tournament featuring the city council against the park board added a humorous note to the planning discussions.