The meeting kicked off with Zapage Development LLC’s request for variances to construct two townhouse dwellings on Washington Avenue, a site previously occupied by a two-family house destroyed by fire. The proposal required variances for minimum lot area, rear yard setback, and driveway placement. James Cipleta, representing the applicant, emphasized the project’s replacement of an eyesore with a modern structure. However, the proposal drew mixed reactions during the public hearing.

Jean Serino, the former property owner, supported the development but flagged potential hazards with the proposed driveway’s location on Washington Avenue. She cited increased traffic and historical accidents at the intersection with Malden Street. Baris Burke, a local business owner, backed the project, believing it would enhance the neighborhood’s value.

Conversely, City Councilor Jim McCar strongly opposed the proposal, highlighting the lack of updated driveway plans and the intersection’s existing dangers. He underscored the presence of nearby obstacles, such as a telephone pole and fire hydrant, questioning the project’s feasibility. McCar referenced feedback from city engineer Nick Rystrom, who warned that the proposed design posed safety risks. He urged the developer to explore alternative driveway placements, potentially on Malden Street, or consider a shared driveway.

Board members deliberated the procedural implications of granting variances, recognizing that approval would limit their ability to mandate future changes. They noted that variances must precede any city council votes on the application. Discussions emphasized the need for collaboration with the city council to address safety concerns before proceeding. Ultimately, the board approved the variances with conditions, including a one-year expiration if the variance remained unused, though the decision was not unanimous.

Attention then shifted to Broadway 700 LLC’s application to redevelop 700 Broadway into a 20-unit apartment building. The applicant’s attorney explained the variances needed due to the property’s irregular shape and sloping topography. The project aimed to replace an outdated structure with a more energy-efficient development, aligning with city planning objectives.

Yet, the proposal faced considerable opposition from residents. Masha Kurabus and Colleen Russo, both local residents, voiced concerns over potential parking issues and increased congestion, particularly with ride-sharing services. Russo questioned the rationale for approving a large development when smaller projects had been previously denied. She cautioned that the development could negatively impact privacy, property values, and local infrastructure, disrupting the neighborhood’s residential character.

Despite these objections, the board granted the variance with similar conditions as the Zapage project. Chairman Michael G. Tucker cast the sole dissenting vote. The board underscored that rights granted by the variance would lapse within a year if not acted upon, and site plan review approval was required before applying for a building permit.

The meeting continued with other applications, including a variance request for 18 to 22 Green Street by Development LLC. The applicant argued that changes, such as reducing the number of units and adding a roof deck, warranted approval. However, the board found the changes insufficient, and the proposal was largely rejected.

Lastly, Parkway Homes Owner LLC sought to withdraw their application for a mixed-use development variance, which the board unanimously approved. The meeting concluded with Fabio Casco Garcia’s successful petition for a special permit to expand a two-family structure on Eastern Avenue, with conditions similar to other approvals.