The property on Alton Road became the focal point of the meeting due to its extensive violations and the owner’s request for an after-the-fact variance. Neighbors Steven and Iana Bonjini raised serious objections, citing unpermitted construction dating back over two years and expressing concerns about flooding and safety issues. Despite a cease and desist order, the property was reportedly being used as an Airbnb, further exacerbating tensions.

The Bonjinis insisted that the board address the matter instead of granting further continuances, arguing that the existing conditions were untenable. They sought to submit written objections if the continuance was approved, which staff encouraged. Board members engaged in a discussion about the merits of the continuance request, balancing the need for resolution with the issues presented by the neighbors.

Members of the board debated whether to impose a condition that this would be the final continuance. The board was informed that this was the first time the item appeared on the agenda for consideration after a previous meeting cancellation. Despite the reasonable grounds for the continuance request, the board acknowledged the importance of the neighbors’ concerns and the need for enforcement.

The property was already under scrutiny with two open special magistrate cases, requiring compliance by July 2026 or facing fines. The board noted the potential life safety issues highlighted by the building department’s cease and desist order, which could lead to referral to the unsafe structures board for repair or demolition. The board emphasized the necessity of compliance, reflecting concerns about the property owner’s past behavior.

The board’s decision on the continuance was not finalized during the meeting, pending a formal vote. This highlighted the ongoing challenges the board faces in balancing compliance enforcement with fair consideration of variance requests, while ensuring public safety and addressing community concerns.

Another agenda item involved a request for a variance on Sheridan Avenue, where the applicant aimed to construct a swimming pool in the front yard due to the lot’s unique shape. The 1937 property presented challenges, as the existing home occupied most of the rear yard. The applicant argued that the pool’s location was the only feasible option, with support from neighbors and compliance with zoning regulations.

The board members focused on the existing hedge’s impact on visibility and the lot’s distinct characteristics compared to others in the area. Staff confirmed the lot’s uniqueness and the lack of specific conditions for approval in the report.

In addition to these discussions, the board considered a variance request for the Corinthian condominium on Collins Avenue, related to emergency egress stairs mandated by fire safety regulations. The 1967 building required a second means of egress due to ongoing renovations. The proposed stairs would encroach on sideyard setbacks, necessitating a variance for the total setbacks.

The board reviewed the application, which included a presentation by the condominium’s representative, detailing the constraints and safety requirements. The proposed emergency exit, which would be secured with a gate, aimed to meet fire marshal standards without increasing occupancy levels. The board unanimously approved the variance request.