The most debated topic during the meeting was Gnome Surf’s Notice of Intent for constructing a headquarters and associated facilities on a 7.21-acre site located at zero Main Road. The proposed design includes a barnadium-style building, parking, a septic system, and a gravel driveway. The project aims to comply with Massachusetts stormwater standards, with a bio-retention area planned to manage runoff. However, access to the site became a contentious issue, with the planning board suggesting entry from a southern parcel, closer to an isolated wetland. Gnome Surf’s representatives argued against this, citing stormwater management difficulties and environmental concerns. They preferred access via Main Road, highlighting the minimal traffic due to the facility’s seasonal operation.

The proposed design also includes five 14×14 cottages intended for use by autistic children and their families during summer months. The commission members expressed a need to protect wetland areas, with some suggesting the stormwater management plan might be overly complex for the project’s scale. Discussions with the planning board are ongoing, with hopes to reach a decision on the access route at a June meeting. Gnome Surf made it clear that commission feedback would be instrumental in presenting their case to the planning board.

In addition to Gnome Surf, the commission reviewed multiple dock installation proposals, all represented by Greg Nichols from South Coast Engineering. One notable proposal involved replacing an unlicensed dock on Carter’s Way with a new structure, including a boardwalk and gangway. The design aims to minimize ecological disruption by allowing sunlight penetration through the boardwalk. The commission requested alternative access plans to avoid wetland alteration, scheduling further discussions for June 23rd.

Another dock proposal by Scott and Barbara Jones at Carter’s Way involved a fixed pier and float. This design incorporated float stops and complied with town dock policies, with no eel grass found in the area, alleviating environmental concerns. A third proposal from Matthew Doyle on Erift Road aimed to extend an existing dock. Despite no evidence of eel grass, some commission members abstained from the vote due to potential conflicts of interest.

Discussions also included a dock proposal on River Road, where access and environmental concerns were prominent. The commission requested a continuance to allow for revised plans, particularly focusing on access paths and wetland delineation. Concerns were also raised about the impact on shellfish habitats due to the site’s shallow nature.

Another issue was the enforcement order discussion regarding unauthorized alterations on Heritage Drive. The commission emphasized the importance of compliance with the Wetlands Protection Act and moved to issue an enforcement order to address these concerns.

Financial matters were also on the agenda, with payments for advertising and open space plan updates receiving unanimous approval. An emergency certification for repairs on Main Road was ratified to ensure public safety.

The meeting concluded with discussions on a neighborhood dispute involving a superseding order issued by the state. The commission clarified access rights concerning a pre-existing subdivision, with ongoing adjudicatory hearings noted. Additionally, concerns about a Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) situation were raised, emphasizing the need for improved communication and representation of the commission’s findings in related projects.