The primary focus of the meeting was the application submitted by GHS Properties Management LLC. The proposal sought to transform an undersized commercial lot into a residential property, challenging the current zoning regulations of the ED1 zone. The applicant’s representative, Jared Pape, explained that the existing office structure, surrounded by residential properties, closely resembled a single-family home. The property, measuring only 0.11 acres, falls short of the one-acre minimum required in the ED1 zone, presenting challenges for commercial viability.

The application included requests for use and bulk variances due to the non-conforming lot size and setbacks. The proposed conversion involved adding a two-and-a-half-story addition to the existing structure, maintaining the current footprint while adjusting the setbacks due to the overhang of the second story. The proposal outlined a five-bedroom residence, with assurances that the project would not alter drainage patterns or increase impervious surfaces.

Concerns were raised about the compatibility of residential use within the ED1 zone, which emphasizes economic development and job creation. Board members questioned the potential impact on local tax revenue and employment opportunities, discussing how the residential conversion aligns with community goals. Despite these concerns, the applicant’s representatives argued that the lot’s size and location rendered it more suitable for residential use, consistent with the surrounding neighborhood’s character.

Significant discussion revolved around the challenges posed by the property’s dimensions, which limited its commercial potential. The applicant’s team, including planner Allison Coffin, detailed the variances sought, emphasizing that the proposed use would not impair public health, safety, or welfare. Coffin highlighted the historical residential nature of the property before its commercial conversion.

The board also deliberated on parking requirements for the proposed residence, with concerns about accommodating vehicles safely in the busy Route 35 area. The applicant confirmed that three parking spaces, sufficient for the five-bedroom home, could be accommodated on-site. Discussions acknowledged the impossibility of on-street parking due to the property’s location.

During the public portion, a neighbor inquired about the potential for the residence to be rented rather than owner-occupied. The response clarified that such details were not part of the approval process. Concerns about the property’s future use, particularly the possibility of it becoming an Airbnb, were addressed by the board attorney, who noted that local zoning ordinances already prohibit such rentals.

The board’s decision ultimately leaned toward approving the conversion, with members recognizing the need for the property to remain usable rather than fall into disrepair. The final vote saw a majority in favor of the application, with hopes expressed for a family to occupy the residence, blending seamlessly with the neighborhood.

In addition to the primary application, the board also addressed other matters, including the approval of a C variance for Josephine Sabatino on Brewster Circle, legitimizing an existing concrete patio with specific setback conditions. Also discussed was a driveway expansion proposal for John Rodriguez at Stony Brook Drive, with conditions to mitigate drainage concerns.