A thorough analysis of the sewer project costs was a central topic of discussion. The board examined the betterment policy that involves assigning Sewer Equivalent Units (SEUs) to properties within the service area, determining their financial obligations. With a project estimate of approximately $49.65 million, the board highlighted the role of State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan forgiveness in reducing the town’s financial burden to under $40 million. The project involves constructing a sewer system, including collection systems and grinder pumps. The board evaluated the potential impact of covering residential grinder pump costs, with property owners facing an annual payment of about $579 if costs are spread over 30 years. The board emphasized that final assessments would be presented in a future session.

Concurrently, the Cape Cod Country Club Solar Project was discussed, with a focus on negotiations for a large-scale solar array. The town’s collaboration with a private developer, Cur Sky Energy, is set to transform the golf course property into a solar energy site. The developer plans to donate 138 acres of the property to the town, retaining seven acres for future development, potentially for affordable housing. The board acknowledged the complexities of negotiating land leases, payment agreements, and tax arrangements to maximize community benefits from the solar initiative. The project promises to contribute to the town’s renewable energy goals and economic development strategies.

In addition to these major infrastructure projects, the meeting covered discussions about diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) initiatives. The board explored the recruitment challenges for a DEIB officer, opting to hire a consultant to establish a strategic plan with measurable outcomes. The aim is to extend the DEIB efforts beyond town employees to the wider community.

An issue involved the potential rescission of a $3.4 million affordable housing fund allocation for a project by Bushwood 545 LLC. The board debated the project’s viability amid concerns about contract fulfillment and financial commitment. While some members advocated for maintaining support for the project to address workforce housing needs, others suggested reallocating funds to more feasible initiatives. The board ultimately deferred the decision, allowing time to reassess the project’s progress.

The meeting also featured an update on the after-action report for Winter Storm Fernando, emphasizing the need for improved communication strategies during emergencies. The board recognized the importance of establishing a more resilient emergency response framework, including the potential appointment of a dedicated public information officer to manage crisis communications effectively.