The meeting began with an update from Bill Sprat, the executive director of Public Works, on the dam construction project. Sprat confirmed that the permitting phase was complete and that construction is slated to begin shortly, with state grants covering approximately 90% of the $1.4 million project cost. The town’s contribution is expected to be between $110,000 and $140,000. The project will involve removing the spillway and fish ladder, setting up environmental controls, and ensuring site security. Sprat assured that construction noise and vibration would adhere to local restrictions, operating between 7 AM and 7 PM.

Concerns were raised about the potential impact on local fish habitats due to the drawdown of the impoundment area. Sprat, along with Adrian Dung, explained that a continuous water flow would be maintained to prevent disruption to the river’s ecosystem. They highlighted the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries’ review, which confirmed that the project would not harm local wildlife.

The board’s decision to remove the dam has sparked differing opinions among residents. Richard Klug, a resident near the river, expressed gratitude for the repair decision, noting that community voices had been heard through public meetings and focus groups. In contrast, Donna McKenzie emphasized the emotional weight of the dam’s removal.

Discussion also touched upon the potential liabilities associated with upstream dam failures and the town’s legal responsibilities. The dam’s classification as a high hazard structure prompted the decision to proceed with its removal to mitigate risks associated with severe weather events. The board emphasized the importance of maintaining open communication with the public throughout the project, planning biweekly updates and informational meetings for nearby residents.

The meeting further explored the broader environmental implications of the dam removal. Emily Norton, from the Charles River Watershed Association, highlighted the ecological benefits of removing aging dams, such as improved fish passage, sediment transport, and reduced thermal pollution. She noted that dam removal could lead to ecological restoration and a healthier river ecosystem.

The board also addressed concerns about sediment monitoring and potential contamination from historical industrial activities. Residents raised questions about the integrity of the dam’s structure and the potential environmental impacts of lowering the river level. A representative assured that sediment sampling had been conducted, revealing no contaminant levels exceeding regulatory thresholds.

In addition to the dam discussion, the board moved on to address other town matters, including the appointment of new police officers, Matthew Hanley and Joshua Rege, contingent upon their successful completion of police academy training. The meeting also covered updates on the town’s election recount process, which revealed a tie for one position, necessitating the Select Board to appoint an interim member until the next election.

The introduction of neon signs at polling booths was suggested as a reminder for voters to properly fill in their ballots to prevent counting complications.