The proposed article to allow duplexes in a wider range of areas than currently permitted was the primary focus of the meeting, generating considerable debate. Board members expressed varying opinions on whether the change would benefit the town’s housing stock or disrupt the community’s character. One board member highlighted the drastic shift from a tightly controlled allowance to a broader, almost unrestrained proposal that could impact up to 80% of the town. This sparked concerns that the board might be unprepared for such a sweeping change without thorough public discourse.

The discussion revolved around the need for more controlled approaches to introducing duplexes, emphasizing site plan reviews to maintain neighborhood character and ensuring quality construction. Some members advocated for the proposal, citing the inefficient use of land in larger lot zones and suggesting that duplexes could provide a viable solution to housing shortages. In contrast, others stressed the necessity of preserving community character and infrastructure capacities, particularly regarding transportation and sewer systems. The board agreed on the importance of a cautious approach.

The board also considered the creation of a multi-family district as a potential solution, possibly implementing a gradient approach for varying densities depending on location. The need for workforce housing was emphasized, with a member noting the critical demand for such developments over single-family homes or duplexes. There was a consensus to continue exploring both duplexes and multi-family housing options, keeping the topic on the agenda for the upcoming meeting on July 7. Public input was deemed essential, and the board agreed to advertise the proposal adequately to facilitate community engagement.

The meeting also included deliberations on the development plan on Quisset Avenue, where an application to transform one lot into three was endorsed. Concerns about environmental impacts, particularly coastal erosion management and local wildlife, were addressed. The attorney representing the applicant clarified that such matters fall under the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission, guided by state wetlands regulations. Despite these concerns, the board unanimously endorsed the plan as an approval not required.

Safety measures in parking lot design were another topic of interest, with the board discussing the implementation of bollards to protect pedestrians and workers. The board agreed on the necessity of bollards, citing a recent incident where a vehicle crashed into a building.

The meeting concluded with updates on zoning articles for the fall Town Meeting. Three proposed articles were outlined: technical corrections in the zoning bylaw, allowing duplexes by right in agricultural and residential districts, and clarifying language regarding the Zoning Board of Appeals. Concerns were raised about the duplex proposal’s implications for community character, with strong opposition from some members. The board recognized the importance of public discourse and agreed to consider community feedback before proceeding with the proposal.