The board’s deliberation on waste and recycling services underscored a shift in the town’s approach to managing refuse. A public forum had previously been held to gather input, which informed the board’s decision to set an annual fee of $100 for a standard waste collection package. This package includes a 35-gallon trash barrel, with options to upgrade to larger barrels at additional costs. The board aimed to balance maintaining affordability for residents with the financial realities of the program. The Department of Environmental Protection (D) grant, covering only a portion of the barrel costs, necessitated careful financial planning.

The board also addressed recycling options, deciding to limit residents to a single 65-gallon recycling barrel, citing grant constraints and spatial concerns. They eliminated the option for a second recycling barrel but considered abatements for seniors to help manage fees. The board emphasized a pricing structure that would encourage responsible waste management while still offering savings to residents accustomed to using orange bags for waste disposal.

To implement these changes, the board approved an adjustment to the collection schedule, shifting to a Tuesday-Wednesday pickup cycle to avoid conflicts with holiday schedules. They also discussed logistical aspects, such as integrating the fees into existing utility bills and ensuring timely communication with residents about the upcoming changes.

Meanwhile, the proposal for a temporary sculpture at Reed Park sparked a discussion. The sculpture, a six-foot-tall mermaid, raised concerns about its placement and potential impact on the park’s environment. Board members questioned its proximity to a tree, potential root damage, and the safety implications of children climbing on the installation. While the artist had secured necessary insurance and initial approvals, additional scrutiny was required from the Department of Public Works and a tree warden to evaluate the placement’s suitability.

Public input was sought, with one resident expressing both support for the local artist and apprehension about making the installation permanent. The board decided to approve the sculpture temporarily, with stipulations that it would not be lighted and would require further review. The board underscored the importance of engaging the community in discussions about public art.

In addition to these primary topics, the board discussed transparency issues in harbor management, specifically regarding documentation and reporting protocols. Concerns were raised about the adequacy of current transaction logs and the need for clear, accessible records. Discussions highlighted the disconnect between existing bylaws and the documentation produced, emphasizing the need for clarity and potentially revised reporting standards.

The board also touched upon various other town matters, including early voting hours for upcoming elections, committee appointments, and the town’s financial updates. Notably, a state grant was allocated for senior center improvements, and discussions were underway about the potential acquisition of a new police motorcycle, which prompted conversation about its necessity.