Acushnet Board Considers Regional Dispatch Hub Role, Shares Services Amid Staff Shortages

In a recent Acushnet Board of Selectmen meeting, discussions centered around two significant proposals that could reshape local government operations. The first was a potential regionalization of dispatch services, with Acushnet serving as the hub. The second focused on shared services and staff positions with neighboring towns due to difficulties in filling vacancies at current salary levels. Additionally, the board addressed the right of first refusal for a $600,000, 27-acre parcel of land on Middle Road, ultimately deeming the purchase economically unfeasible.

The board deliberated on a proposal to investigate the establishment of a regional dispatch center based in Acushnet. The town has received inquiries from neighboring communities interested in partnering for a regional dispatch system, which could be supported by various planning grants. While the idea was met with interest, concerns were raised over the potential for system congestion and the impact on Acushnet’s response times and service quality. The board agreed to explore the proposal further, emphasizing the need to maintain control and service levels for Acushnet residents.

In addressing staff shortages, the board considered expanding inquiries into sharing staff positions with other towns, a strategy already in motion for a town planner role. With several adjacent towns, including Acushnet, struggling to attract candidates for vacant positions, the idea of sharing services was proposed as a potential solution to maintain service levels. The board expressed its intention to explore all available options to fill gaps and ensure efficient operation of town services.

The board also decided against exercising the town’s right of first refusal to purchase a sizeable land parcel, citing the high cost and significant portion of wetlands on the property. Despite the assessed value in terms of conservation and open space, the financial implications and other pressing budgetary considerations led to the decision to forgo the opportunity.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: