At the forefront of the commission’s meeting was the public hearing concerning the delineation of wetlands. The applicant, represented by Andrew Gman and Thomas HS, presented changes to the wetland boundaries and connectivity between different systems on a property. After visits to the site by some commission members, there was general satisfaction with the accuracy of the delineation. However, a member of the public voiced concerns about the potential impact of the proposed project on the wetland area and its inhabitants, with a focus on preserving the habitat of box turtles. The commission agreed to issue the delineation but required the submission of a final updated plan that eliminated non-pertinent information to enhance clarity.

Subsequently, the commission discussed a certificate of compliance for a property on M Road. During a site visit, the commission noted that the project was nearing completion but identified a concern with the placement of a large septic system on a hill, which could affect the nearby river. The commission decided to issue a certificate of compliance contingent on the resolution of the septic system placement.

Moreover, the meeting delved into the modifications needed for the drainage system on Main Street. The project’s engineer provided new designs and calculations. The commission requested a stamped set of plans, a construction schedule, and weekly updates to monitor progress. They highlighted the necessity of site stabilization and effective coordination between the commission and the project’s engineer.

Also discussed was a revised plan for a property on Map Pois Road, where a new dwelling was constructed outside the buffer zone. The commission contemplated issuing a partial certificate of compliance to reflect the pending replication area, which is part of restoring the wetlands to their original condition.

A cease and desist letter for construction activities off CL’s Way was debated following a complaint and a stop work order. The commission reviewed a letter from the attorney for the trust that provided documentation related to stream clearing. However, discrepancies arose due to the lack of records at the town hall for the documentation submitted. The commission discussed how to proceed with the cease and desist order and the information from the attorney.

Another topic of discussion was a property where trees were cleared and gravel laid on an access road. The commission debated whether the land qualified for an agricultural exemption and whether the clearing near an intermittent stream was legal. There was uncertainty over whether the work was conducted by the owner or a mosquito control company. Despite the debate, the cease-and-desist order remained in effect until proper permitting was in place.

The commission also discussed a settlement agreement with Pushan Solar LLC, which required the commission’s signature to remove liability.

Finally, the meeting concluded with updates on various administrative matters, including the receipt of resumes for a new conservation agent and expressions of gratitude for the use of the meeting space provided by the chief. The next meeting was scheduled for June 12th, 2024, at the town hall meeting room.