04:50A representative from Wood and Cameron Incorporated explained that the project is part of a broader initiative under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan to address elevated levels of metals and petroleum contaminants at the site. The commission reviewed the proposed measures, which include a double row of silt fences and straw waddles to control erosion, as well as oil absorbent booms to contain potential spills.

The member discussion revealed concerns about the proximity of the leaching area for contaminated soils to the Kushner River. Suggestions were made to relocate this area further from the waterway to prevent environmental risks. The representative assured that all contaminated materials would be managed by a licensed site professional. The commission agreed to continue the public hearing to allow for further discussion and clarification on these plans, which are set to commence in the summer.

Parallel to the discussion of contaminated soil remediation, the meeting addressed a detailed historical investigation of the site conducted by the Kushner Company, which spanned over 17 years. This investigation included over 300 soil warnings and approximately 600 to 700 sample analytical points, all of which were validated through third-party processes. The representative emphasized that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had applied intensive scrutiny to every data point, confirming the thoroughness of the investigation. This background provided the commission and public with confidence in the accuracy of the contamination’s characterization.

42:55In addition to the contamination issues on Sloan Street, the commission faced challenges related to stormwater management on Cushing Lane. A discussion emerged regarding the adequacy of submitted documentation, particularly whether it was stamped or certified by a licensed professional. Some members expressed skepticism about the calculations presented, questioning the validity without formal certification. The discussion became heated as the need for a peer review by another engineer was debated, with opinions divided over whether the current documentation was sufficient.

A motion was proposed to continue the discussion about 21 Cushing Lane to the next meeting, emphasizing the necessity of receiving certified plans and documentation to make an informed decision. The commission agreed to await further documentation to ensure compliance with environmental regulations and proper procedural oversight.

23:24Additionally, the commission addressed routine matters involving special conditions for development projects. Notably, the commission approved special conditions for lot 12 at Park Drive, which included erosion control inspections, restrictions on stockpiling materials, and specific washout procedures for concrete.

30:36The meeting also covered a Notice of Intent filed by Joseph Castello for the construction of a single-family dwelling at lot 11 Park Drive. The applicant’s representative detailed the proposal, including plans for septic systems and drainage. The commission expressed satisfaction with the proposed environmental protections, notably a turtle protection plan, and emphasized the need for a follow-up inspection prior to construction activities.

27:38Lastly, the commission deliberated on an after-the-fact request for determination by Kathleen Barrows for property on Halfway Road. This involved the removal of historic fill piling, with a member recusing themselves due to a potential conflict of interest. The commission deemed the prior site visit satisfactory.