One of the primary topics of discussion was the informal proposal regarding 96R Pekam Road, where the applicant, represented by Cameron LLC and Zenith Consulting Engineering LLC, sought to subdivide the area into three lots with a roadway. The board revisited historical concerns about drainage, recalling a meeting from February 2023, and emphasized the need for thorough stormwater management planning. The topography of the area, particularly along Woodland Road with its ten-foot elevation difference, posed significant challenges. Board members discussed the potential for a gravel road instead of a paved one, noting the risk of increased runoff and sediment washing into catch basins. Without percolation tests, there were doubts about the proposed drainage system’s effectiveness, especially in high groundwater areas.

The board suggested alternatives such as paving the initial section of the road or exploring access via Pine or Hemlock Road to mitigate elevation challenges. They stressed the importance of soil testing and collecting historical data from the Public Works Department to inform decision-making. Concerns about existing drainage issues in the area highlighted the necessity of a comprehensive assessment of the site’s suitability for development.

The meeting also addressed a public hearing for a 6-megawatt solar photovoltaic project on Middle Road, proposed by Re Wild Renewables LLC. The site plan review focused on utilizing 13.6 acres of a 54-acre site, with representatives assuring minimal wetland impact but acknowledging work within a 100-foot buffer zone. Concerns about stormwater management persisted, given the conversion of a field to a gravel road for fire department access. Representatives aimed to address issues raised by a peer reviewer and planned to submit a detailed response soon.

Public participation underscored apprehension about the solar project’s environmental impact, particularly regarding the adequacy of the proposed detention basin for stormwater management. Questions about the Zoom link’s functionality for virtual attendance reflected broader concerns about accessibility during the meeting. Attendees sought clarity on prior discussions with the Conservation Commission, emphasizing the need for clear solutions to wetland management and stormwater runoff issues.

Technical difficulties with virtual access led to a postponement of the public hearing, with board members acknowledging that continuing the meeting would violate open meeting laws. As a result, the hearing was rescheduled for January 2nd, with a preference expressed for further delay until January 16th to ensure a complete peer review. Attendees expressed disappointment at the postponement, but there was consensus that a thorough and efficient review process was necessary.