The meeting began with an in-depth analysis of a traffic study for the proposed development site on Route 2A. The study, presented by a traffic engineer from BSC Group, highlighted the current traffic conditions and projected increases due to the new housing units. Critical intersections were analyzed during peak hours, revealing anticipated increases of 56 trips in the morning and 66 in the evening, corresponding with existing traffic patterns. Concerns were voiced about traffic counts taken in June possibly not reflecting typical conditions due to varying school schedules. Recommendations to mitigate traffic impacts included promoting public transportation use and expanding sidewalks along Route 2A, alongside the proposed 157 parking spaces for the development, aligning with standard transportation demand practices.

Committee members also discussed the potential for increased pedestrian traffic, with suggestions for crosswalks and traffic-calming measures to ensure safety. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (Mass DOT) was referenced regarding an ongoing highway project, with skepticism expressed about its relevance and projected completion date of 2050. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of public transportation use in the area, with the study assuming that most residents would drive, potentially skewing traffic projections.

Infrastructure concerns extended to water and sewer services, with the Department of Public Works (DPW) noting the project’s inclusion in capacity planning. The applicant requested waivers for connection fees, estimated at $273,000 for water and $327,000 for sewer. The project’s nonprofit status was highlighted, with an emphasis on enhancing affordable housing availability in Ayer. The DPW also requested off-site improvements, such as a sidewalk to connect to the Shop and Save, and noted the need for wider parking access driveways and a firetruck turning analysis.

Environmental considerations were addressed, focusing on the project’s location in a light industrial area and potential dust, odor, and noise impacts. The site spans three zoning districts, with construction management plans to minimize environmental disturbances. The Conservation Commission noted the necessity of a Notice of Intent due to work within a 100-foot buffer zone.

Further details about the project’s phases emerged, with questions about the extent of work during each phase. The planning team is refining details based on peer review feedback, while the town’s economic and community development expressed support for the project. The committee discussed the affordable housing trust and committee presentation scheduled for August 31st.

The peer review process also drew attention, with only one proposal received from Green International. Members debated whether to pursue additional proposals or proceed with the existing one, acknowledging the importance of timely decisions to avoid project delays. Public comments raised concerns about the impact on water and sewer systems, calling for transparency and assurances that infrastructure could support the development.