The proposed second-story addition for the Gerards’ home became the focal point of the meeting as the applicants, represented by their architect, sought approval for their project. The addition, designed to cover only half of the house’s current footprint, promised no changes to ground coverage, impervious surface area, or drainage patterns. To address concerns about the potential impact on neighboring properties, particularly regarding runoff water, the architect assured the board that no additional drains would direct rainwater towards adjacent lots. The board’s inquiries extended to the aesthetic continuity of the property, with the applicants confirming that new siding materials would match the existing exterior.

A critical aspect of the hearing involved the board’s scrutiny of the proposed chimney height, as it was unclear whether building code requirements had been met. Upon questioning, the architect admitted they had yet to review the specific height regulations for chimneys, signaling a possible oversight in the planning stages. Furthermore, the board examined the need for a variance concerning the rear yard. The architect cited the home’s longstanding condition since 1952 and the pre-existing undersized lot as grounds for the variance request, which the board took under consideration.

The public hearing segment of the meeting concluded without a definitive decision on the Gerard’s application. The board indicated that a future meeting would determine the outcome of the application.

Additionally, the Land Use Board engaged in discussions regarding the overall impact of construction within the town. Council members acknowledged the disturbances caused to residents due to ongoing development activities. Among the topics were the management of local flora, specifically addressing concerns about the planting of bamboo and the preservation of existing trees near the property under discussion. The applicants assured that the neighboring trees would remain undisturbed, although trimming would occur if necessary. A neighbor voiced unease over the sightlines and the addition’s potential to alter the neighborhood’s character, as well as worries about construction up to the property line.

Further, the board tackled resolutions involving community accessibility improvements, such as the installation of handicap ramps. A proposal to adjust the multiplier for variances was also discussed.