Amherst Conservation Commission Supports Ecological Restoration at Wayfinder Site

The Amherst Conservation Commission meeting on May 14, 2025, addressed several topics regarding local ecological and environmental projects. The commission reviewed and approved modifications for forest management regulations, discussed the ecological benefits of the salamander egg mass survey, deliberated on the proposed ecological restoration of Kellogg Brook at the Wayfinder site, and evaluated development projects that intersect with sensitive wetland areas.

37:17The primary focus of the meeting was the ecological restoration project at the Wayfinder site on South Street, which involves the daylighting of the Kellogg Brook. The restoration plan, driven by the town’s planning department, seeks to address the failure of a culvert system while enhancing ecological integrity through the creation of a new stream channel and formalized pathways. The project proposes to re-establish 377 feet of stream bank, restore nearly 5,400 square feet of bordering vegetated wetlands (BVW), and create 282 feet of land underwater. A representative presented visual materials illustrating the current conditions and the proposed changes, emphasizing the project’s goal to balance ecological restoration with recreational access for the community. Key aspects of the plan include implementing erosion control measures and ensuring vegetative growth before any existing structures are removed.

54:00Commission members raised several questions regarding the project’s design and impact, particularly about water flow management and potential reinforcement measures to prevent scouring during high water events. The representative assured the commission that the channel would be designed with existing topography and hydrology in mind to minimize ecological disruption. The commission expressed a preference for moving forward with the discussion on the order of conditions, with plans to engage further with Wayfinder representatives before finalizing decisions.

57:29Another topic was the mixed-use residential development at West Bay Road, proposed by Archipelago Investments LLC and Hampshire College. The project involves constructing three residential structures, which necessitates variances due to encroachment into wetland buffer zones. The commission emphasized the need for updated wetland delineations and a comprehensive mitigation plan, citing concerns over the project’s impact on local wildlife and the ecosystem. Residents voiced strong opposition during the public comment period, highlighting potential threats to the wetland habitat and insufficient parking provisions. The commission echoed these concerns, stressing the need to uphold existing wetland bylaws.

The meeting also addressed ongoing challenges at Hickory Ridge, where repeated instances of turbid water leaving the construction site prompted discussions on compliance and stabilization measures. The individual overseeing monitoring efforts reported on continued communication with the construction team to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs), such as silt fencing and hydroseeding. The commission discussed the need for clear deadlines for compliance and the potential implementation of a stop work order if issues persist.

33:56The commission reviewed a proposed construction project on Southeast Street, focusing on water quality management during construction. The project includes permanent boundary markings and erosion control measures. Concerns about snow storage practices and final inspections before removing erosion controls were noted, with the public hearing continued for further discussion.

13:11In addition to these primary topics, the commission discussed updates on a volunteer egg mass survey for yellow spotted salamanders, which reported a noteworthy increase in egg mass counts attributed to road closures. The educational role of these surveys and their positive impact on local wildlife populations were highlighted, with commission members expressing enthusiasm for continued community involvement in conservation efforts.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: