The discussion regarding the Jones Library building project revealed concerns about the potential strain on donations to the library’s annual fund due to the ongoing capital campaign. The library director acknowledged the complications arising from being in an interim space, which has resulted in reduced programming figures. The possibility of increased programming following the completion of the capital campaign was discussed as a potential way to alleviate the situation once the funding focus shifts.

The committee explored the potential for collaboration among town departments, including Recreation, Senior Services, and the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion department, in hosting cultural events and addressing larger policy questions. The DEI director pointed out the limitations caused by insufficient staffing and time, underlining the need to increase capacity for policy-related work. Additionally, the facilities department addressed anticipated expenses for the North Amherst Library, previously covered by the Jones Library, prompting inquiries into the allocation of these expenses in the town’s budget and the difference in operating costs post-completion of the building project.

In the realm of facilities, there was an emphasis on the necessity for more detailed budget narratives that encompass all facilities. The committee examined the allocation of fees for using community spaces, utility, and maintenance costs for the Old North Amherst School and the South Amherst School, and the implications of sustainability initiatives like solar installations on utility expenses. The committee also sought clarity on the budget’s reflection of savings from these initiatives and their redistribution among departments.

The town manager’s budget was scrutinized for the considerable increases in Personnel Services across various departments, with an average of around 9%. The town manager cited the integration of a compensation classification study’s recommendations as one factor in managing labor costs and collective bargaining agreements. The committee also inquired about the status of the Communications Manager position and raised concerns regarding the town’s fee structures and the coverage of service costs.

Another focal point was the challenge of recruiting and retaining employees for municipal and state positions in competition with the private sector and the shift to remote work. The committee discussed multi-year budget projections, the sustainability of a 2.5% increase in each functional operating budget, and strategies for managing projected deficits.

Lastly, the committee considered the use of reimbursements to fill a capital stabilization hole and the cautious approach to borrowing, with discussions on the impacts of extra state money and the importance of conservative budget projections. The uncertainty of the upcoming national election and its potential effects on funding was also a topic of debate. The meeting concluded with a vote to adjourn.