29:49The most debated topic was the proposed ADU on Lincoln Avenue, which drew extensive discussion over its design and potential neighborhood impact. The applicant presented the design, emphasizing architectural harmony with the existing dwelling. The ADU features a single-story structure with various design options focusing on compatibility with the surrounding historic homes. The project aimed to integrate seamlessly into the neighborhood, with considerations for roof pitch, window placements, and landscaping.

32:27One member expressed a preference for a steep roof pitch, which was seen to better fit the neighborhood’s character. The discussion revealed a split among commissioners about the necessity and aesthetic value of window shutters, with some favoring wooden designs over plastic alternatives. The proposed design included a dual siding material elevation treatment and a significant roof overhang above the main entrance for added protection against the elements.

55:18Parking emerged as a issue, with concerns about the potential for increased congestion in the area. Although the commission does not have jurisdiction over parking regulations, members noted that the ADU’s proximity to public transportation could mitigate the need for additional parking spaces. Residents voiced apprehensions about the existing parking situation, with one neighbor suggesting that additional cars might lead to parking on lawns, detracting from the neighborhood’s aesthetic.

Public comments highlighted the community’s mixed reactions. One neighbor supported the ADU’s low-profile design, appreciating that it minimized invasions of privacy. Another resident stressed the importance of maintaining the neighborhood’s distinct character, urging the commission to consider broader implications of the development. Suggestions for improving the project’s integration included expanding porch dimensions and adding shrubbery for a more residential feel.

01:42:16The commission ultimately voted to grant a certificate of appropriateness for the ADU with specific conditions, such as an 8 in 12 roof pitch and the removal of shutters unless required by building codes.

01:43:44In addition to the ADU discussions, the commission addressed proposed changes to the historic district bylaws, particularly concerning the definition of parking areas. The commission adopted these changes unanimously.

01:45:52The commission also considered a situation involving a property at North Prospect where a fence had been constructed without approval. This led to a retroactive permit application, which will be reviewed in a future meeting. Similarly, an air conditioning unit on Elm Street was noted for not meeting shelter standards.

01:47:29Attention then turned to the planning of a survey and public hearing as part of the East Amherst study. The commission discussed logistical details, including scheduling and public notification strategies, to ensure community engagement. There was consensus on holding a hearing on June 9th, with efforts to facilitate broad participation through various outreach methods.

01:56:44Finally, the commission deliberated on site visit procedures, a topic that highlighted differing views on their necessity and execution. While some members advocated for mandatory site visits for significant projects, others favored a more flexible approach, allowing individual assessments based on the chair’s discretion.