The board approved a proposal for a new storage shed for the Amherst Youth Soccer program at Potwine Lane, following a detailed review of its design and placement. Chair Doug Marshall led the session, where the need for this facility was presented by Megan Rhodess, the president of the Amherst Soccer Association. The proposed pre-fabricated 10×6 storage shed is intended to streamline operations for the volunteer-run organization, serving over 430 local youth. The shed, set to be positioned on a gravel pad near the Plum Brook Recreation Area, aims to provide easy access to essential soccer equipment like field liners and nets.

The board’s discussion focused on the shed’s visual impact and environmental considerations. Concerns were raised about its visibility from the street and its proximity to a wetland buffer. While the design review committee approved the shed’s Peter gray color and gray metal roof for its non-intrusive appearance, there were suggestions to relocate the shed to minimize its visual impact. Board members who visited the site highlighted the importance of balancing functionality with maintaining the aesthetic integrity of the open field setting.

Rhodess addressed these concerns by explaining that the shed’s positioning was chosen to be less visible from the street, with existing bushes helping to screen it. She noted the potential structural issues with moving the shed closer to the wetland area, due to damp conditions. The board eventually reached a consensus, approving the proposal with amendments to its design and placement.

Beyond the shed, the board engaged in discussions about increasing housing density, particularly in the North Pleasant Street area. A member proposed an increase in housing units through strategies such as increasing building height and adjusting lot coverage.

Concerns about public safety and traffic congestion were also prominent. A participant suggested consulting with the Amherst Police Department, referencing events like the Barney blowout as examples of crowd management challenges. Traffic congestion, particularly at the five-way intersection, was cited as an issue, with skepticism about the feasibility of adding thousands more units without exacerbating existing problems.

The board considered the possibility that students living closer to campus might alleviate some traffic congestion, aligning with ideas for improved bicycle and pedestrian pathways to reduce car dependency. Suggestions for dedicated bicycle paths and electric vehicle shuttles were proposed to foster a more walkable and bike-friendly environment.

Community engagement was emphasized throughout the meeting, with board members acknowledging the importance of consulting with local residents and property managers. The management of Puffton Village was mentioned, with one participant noting positive feedback from the owner about proposed developments, although specific concerns were also raised.

Additionally, the board addressed the potential impacts of increased density on neighborhood character. Concerns were voiced about the potential disruption to existing residential areas and the importance of maintaining a balance between development and community identity. The board recognized the need for ongoing dialogue and community involvement in planning initiatives, with future meetings designated to continue these discussions.