The conversation about the University Drive overlay district began with a focus on aesthetics, specifically the requirement for underground wiring in new developments, which would include a new transformer. The overlay district encompasses properties along University Drive, between Northampton Road and Amity Street, and introduces zoning amendments to allow multi-unit buildings with mixed-use ground floors. The proposal has met with both support and skepticism, particularly regarding its impact on local businesses such as the Big Y grocery store and CVS pharmacy. Public comments submitted before the meeting highlighted concerns about potential changes, including effects on groundwater and stormwater management, which are crucial given the area’s environmental sensitivities.

The planner for the town presented the overlay district boundaries and detailed the requirements for architectural and parking standards. There was notable interest from the Big Y property owners, who were enthusiastic about the overlay but do not own the property in question. During the public comment period, residents and business representatives expressed concerns about how these changes might affect existing services, particularly grocery stores and pharmacies that are vital for local residents, including seniors. Alisa Rubenstein, a resident, emphasized the importance of these services for senior housing residents nearby, noting their limited transportation options. Louise C. echoed these sentiments, describing Big Y as a “hub of services” and urging the board to consider the needs of both seniors and students in the area.

Board members debated the potential for the overlay to require specific ground-floor uses, such as retail, and whether this might lead to vacancies or foster economic activity. Some members suggested revisiting the inclusion of the Big Y Plaza in the overlay, arguing that it could proceed without the plaza and be reconsidered later.

In parallel, the board discussed zoning regulations related to accessory dwelling units (ADUs), spurred by recent changes in state law. The proposed bylaw amendments aim to clarify definitions and standards for ADUs, with a focus on enhancing housing supply. A point of discussion was the size limit for ADUs, which is proposed to be 900 square feet of habitable space, aligning with state legislation. The board contemplated whether to allow larger units through a discretionary permitting process, considering the potential for increased density and the implications for neighborhood resources.

Concerns were raised about the removal of the owner occupancy requirement for ADUs, with some members fearing it could lead to more investor-owned rental properties targeting students, thereby affecting neighborhood dynamics. The board considered defining student housing within the bylaws, which would not require owner occupancy but would mandate adult supervision to address potential behavior issues.

Parking regulations associated with ADUs also drew attention, with discussions on limiting parking spaces to control the number of occupants and prevent excessive parking areas. The board recognized the challenges posed by the new state law and the necessity to adapt local regulations to meet both housing needs and community character.

The meeting touched on procedural matters, including the approval of meeting minutes and updates on ongoing projects, such as the high school track proposal and a preliminary subdivision for a property on Amity Street. Reports from various committees highlighted ongoing challenges and priorities, such as the need for standardized design guidelines and the importance of community input in shaping future developments.