The discussion prominently featured the War Memorial Pool and bathhouse project, which requested a substantial $750,000 allocation. Members expressed concerns about the pool’s operational expenses, noting its limited open season and the continuous maintenance required due to its age. It was suggested that operational metrics, such as cost per user, could be more relevant than profitability in guiding funding decisions. Members also acknowledged the pool’s potential to serve broader community purposes beyond just swimming activities, given its proximity to other public facilities. Nevertheless, the sizeable financial ask prompted questions about its necessity amid other pressing town needs, especially considering the pool’s reported annual operating losses.

Members expressed hesitation to commit large sums to the pool project without further information.

Another discussion topic was the proposed funding for trails and foot bridges, with a request of $150,000. Members expressed strong support for this project.

The Amherst Municipal Affordable Housing Trust also received attention, with a significant funding request of $500,000. Members debated the magnitude of this request, emphasizing the trust’s importance in addressing community housing needs.

The council also reviewed several historical preservation projects, including the stained glass windows, Wildwood house, and the North Cemetery fence. Members acknowledged the stained glass windows as a high priority due to their fragility and the financial burden on the religious congregation responsible for their upkeep. The preservation of historical resources was emphasized as a continuing obligation, with members expressing varying opinions on the urgency and importance of each project.

In addition, the Mil River baseball fields and the proposal for electric dugouts were discussed, with the original funding request reduced from $120,000 to $80,000. Council members expressed mixed opinions on the project’s value, noting its limited use by a small group. Concerns were raised about the project’s alignment with the town’s broader recreational needs and its potential benefits relative to other initiatives.

As the meeting progressed, members discussed the need for clearer communication and prioritization of projects, considering the numerous funding requests totaling $1.3 million. Suggestions were made to involve town staff in helping prioritize these projects and manage the necessary budget reductions. The importance of aligning funding decisions with the overall community benefit was emphasized, with a call for additional information and a coordinated approach to ensure the effectiveness of future meetings.