The proposed policy would prohibit cell phone use in classrooms and during instructional periods. It was suggested that students should store their phones in designated areas or use Yonder pouches, which would secure phones during school hours. The policy emphasized that phones should be powered off or stored in assigned lockers, with exceptions for emergency situations strictly defined. The initiative reflects a broader concern about the negative impact of cell phones on students’ mental health and learning, with one member highlighting social media as a significant contributor to behavioral issues, particularly among girls.

The board acknowledged the challenge of balancing the practical needs of students, such as communication during emergencies, with the educational goal of maintaining focus in the classroom. There was a consensus among board members that parents should play a more significant role in ensuring their children’s adherence to the policy, with the proposed consequence of temporarily confiscating a cell phone, necessitating a meeting with a parent or guardian for its return.

During the discussion, it was noted that many teachers feel overwhelmed by behavioral issues and lack adequate support in managing student cell phone use. The sentiment was expressed that teachers should not have to act as “the phone police.” Instead, the responsibility for student behavior should primarily lie with parents. A member proposed simplifying the policy to a straightforward statement, advocating for decisive language that leaves no room for ambiguity.

The board also addressed the need for consistency across classrooms within schools. A proposal for pilot programs was introduced, with a call for schools interested in testing new strategies, such as Yonder pouches, to receive district support. This approach aims to gather data on the effectiveness of various methods before finalizing the policy.

Additional discussions revolved around the importance of clearly communicating policy changes to families before the school year begins. The board emphasized the necessity of involving school principals and teachers in the conversation, recognizing their vital role in implementing any new policy. Input from these stakeholders was deemed critical to crafting a feasible and enforceable policy that addresses the concerns surrounding cell phone use in schools.

Alongside the cell phone policy debate, the meeting also featured a tribute to Debbie Kofsky, who is retiring after nearly 40 years of service to the district. Kofsky, who served as the executive assistant to the superintendent and the school board, was lauded for her indispensable contributions and commitment. Her professionalism and steady presence were highlighted, with board members expressing gratitude for her support and dedication.

Furthermore, the board received an update on the district’s annual radon testing, which reported no elevated levels in any of the eight facilities tested. The meeting also covered the timeline for the pay 2026 tax levy process, outlining the truth and taxation calendar and the requirements for certification.

Labor negotiations were another topic of discussion, with updates provided on ongoing talks with various employee groups. The board was informed of the commencement of negotiations for contracts set to expire in 2025, with progress reported in some areas and optimism expressed for future agreements.