A major focus of the meeting was the second phase of a budget realignment process, which aimed to address a $21 million deficit through cuts across various school levels and the central office. Superintendent Cory McIntyre outlined the financial challenges, emphasizing the need for strategic decisions to minimize the impact on students. This phase proposed affecting 360 positions, in addition to 50 already cut during the first phase.

Community members and board members alike expressed concern over the depth of these cuts, particularly regarding roles such as literacy and math specialists, instructional coaches, and volunteer service coordinators. These positions are seen as crucial for student success, providing direct classroom support and fostering community engagement.

One speaker, Leanne Mosi Clow, stressed the importance of the K12 media teaching and learning specialist, a role threatened by the cuts. She urged the board to retain this position using funds from the Minnesota K12 Omnibus Bill, arguing its necessity for student access to educational materials and compliance with school policies.

Public comments underscored a shared apprehension about the potential elimination of positions that directly impact educational outcomes. Speakers advocated for the retention of roles that support math and literacy interventions, volunteer coordination, and advanced learning opportunities. Concerns were voiced about the impact of cuts on teacher support, classroom behavior, and community involvement.

The board deliberated on several options to address the budget shortfall, including a proposed operating referendum in 2025. This option would aim to bridge an anticipated $26 million gap but would require further reductions if not approved by voters. Some board members favored this approach, emphasizing the need to seek community input on financial decisions.

However, there was a divergence of opinion on the necessity and timing of a referendum. Several members opposed it, arguing that the state should be responsible for adequately funding education rather than relying on local taxpayers. The discussion reflected broader frustrations with unfunded mandates from the state legislature, which some described as irresponsible.

The debate included the potential closure of the Oakview Middle School pool, a decision that board members agreed should be revisited separately due to its community impact. Similarly, the role of volunteer service coordinators, who have facilitated substantial community involvement, was highlighted as deserving separate consideration.

A proposed modification to retain volunteer service coordinators by adding $230,000 to the budget was put forward but ultimately failed in a tie vote. The board then moved to consider recommendation three from the superintendent, which included over $9 million in central office cuts but no immediate plan for a referendum. This proposal aimed to maintain strategic investments for another year while achieving a fund balance of 8.2%.

Despite initial confusion over the specifics of the recommendations and their implications for various staff roles, the board ultimately passed recommendation three unanimously.

The meeting concluded with reflections on recent school events and community activities.