39:12The redevelopment plan for a property on Memorial Drive emerged as a central topic, with community concern over potential traffic increases. The council discussed an amendment that would provide flexibility in determining vehicle access points, responding to public concerns and a traffic study that identified Fourth Avenue as the most viable access route. However, several residents expressed skepticism about the traffic study’s impartiality, as it was funded by the developer rather than the city. This raised questions about the transparency and credibility of the findings. One resident urged the council to postpone the vote on the amendment until further review could be conducted, emphasizing the need for clarity and trust in the decision-making process. The council’s procedural handling of traffic studies and community involvement sparked debate, with some residents feeling there was a lack of transparency in the council’s decisions.

0:09Concurrently, the council also highlighted Asbury Park’s achievement in receiving a safety award. The city’s risk manager announced that Asbury Park had been recognized with a safety award for the seventh consecutive year, accompanied by a $500 check.

The introduction of an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance was another focal point of the meeting. The ordinance aims to encourage diverse housing options by allowing independent residential units on existing properties. The Director of Planning and Redevelopment provided an overview of the ordinance, detailing regulations such as size restrictions, minimum lease terms, and owner occupancy requirements. The ordinance seeks to promote “soft density” by increasing housing availability without altering neighborhood character. While the ordinance was generally supported, some residents raised concerns about potential nuisances during construction and the impact on property values and taxes. The council clarified that ADUs would be treated similarly to adding an extra bathroom, resulting in increased property value and taxes.

21:03Public comments on the ADU ordinance revealed varying perspectives. Some residents sought clarification on zoning requirements for non-conforming structures, while others questioned tenant placement policies in subsidized housing. One resident expressed frustration about being unable to apply for an ADU due to her property’s non-conforming status, highlighting challenges faced by some property owners under the new ordinance.

57:16The meeting also addressed other redevelopment plans, including a financial agreement related to a 30-year payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) for a townhouse project. The council discussed the duration of PILOT agreements, noting that 30-year agreements are mandatory for condominiums due to a 2002 agreement. Additionally, a redevelopment plan amendment for a property along First Avenue was presented, which sought to increase residential units and eliminate commercial space to reduce traffic impact. The public was invited to comment on the amendment, with concerns raised about parking needs and the availability of traffic studies.

Lastly, the council addressed various other topics, including amendments to special event fees and the adoption of ordinances related to community events. The meeting concluded with motions to close public comments and adjourn.