During the meeting, Tracy Rogers from the Asbury Park Affordable Housing Coalition and Derek Bloom, representing the Mammoth Housing Coalition, presented their case for affordable housing and rent control to mitigate the housing crisis in Asbury Park. Their arguments highlighted the adverse effects of exclusionary zoning and the necessity for equitable housing opportunities as a matter of racial and economic justice. The speakers referenced the Mount Laurel Doctrine, asserting the city’s obligation to facilitate affordable housing development.

Community members supported these sentiments, with speakers from the NAACP discussing the detrimental outcomes of relocation during the Waterfront development. Terry Edstein from Coastal Habitat for Humanity pointed out the dire shortage of affordable housing inventory in Southern Mammoth County, advocating for the donation of land to construct such homes. A resident expressed disappointment regarding the exclusion of affordable housing in the Waterfront Redevelopment plan, urging the council to reconsider its stance.

The meeting also addressed the 1201 Redevelopment project, where a resident emphasized the importance of incorporating affordable housing into the development. Questions arose about the public hearing process for the project, and suggestions were made for traffic calming measures to improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists, like painting bike lanes green and installing speed cameras.

The development on Memorial Drive was another focal point, with residents expressing concerns about the proposed 130-unit project’s impact on the existing neighborhood. Issues of density, safety, and the entrance’s location were discussed, with residents and housing providers alike voicing the need for community involvement in these decisions. Eric Galipo and Kathleen MRI were among those advocating for careful consideration of the site’s access points to ensure neighborhood safety.

In response to the public comments, the council acknowledged the significance of affordable housing and community participation in decision-making. While they cited legal constraints and previous efforts, they reiterated their commitment to addressing the community’s concerns.

Moreover, the council debated the potential implications of density increases and tax incentives for affordable housing, with varied perspectives on the optimal location for an entrance to the development on Memorial Drive. Concerns about traffic safety and professional opinions were considered in the decision-making process.

The council also discussed the renewal of liquor licenses for local establishments, imposing special conditions such as new insurance requirements and security measures. The Asbury L house’s request to continue without live music or DJs was brought up, with concerns about the financial impact of early closure on the business.

Finally, the 2024 Municipal Budget was a topic of deliberation, with public comments addressing the allocation of excess revenue and the comparative expenses of various city departments. The council voted on several ordinances, including zoning permit fees amendments and the CBD Redevelopment plan for a property on Cookman Avenue. Questions were raised about local hiring practices, traffic impact, and the street design associated with development projects.