The project on Bangs Avenue requires variances due to its lack of commercial use on the ground floor, a condition typically mandated in the CBD. Concerns were raised about the project’s deviation from standard parking requirements, as it proposed only six parking spaces instead of the required eight. The developers expressed willingness to contribute financially for the two missing spaces but faced further scrutiny regarding the absence of commercial space. This sparked a broader debate among the board members on whether prioritizing parking over commercial use aligned with the city’s urban development goals.

A significant portion of the board members expressed a clear preference for integrating commercial space on the ground floor, arguing that it would contribute to a more vibrant downtown area. One member highlighted the adverse effects of adding more driveways on busy streets and emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency with existing small commercial units along the block. The board members discussed the potential benefits of eliminating parking for better light access in upper apartments and improving the overall residential product quality.

Some board members acknowledged the necessity of parking, citing its critical role in meeting residents’ needs, yet others argued that commercial space would better serve the community and alleviate some of the parking challenges by reducing the need for additional driveways.

In addition to the primary discussion on commercial space versus parking, the meeting also addressed several technical elements of the project. These included the implementation of a proposed green roof system designed to manage stormwater runoff effectively. The green roof, characterized as “semi-intensive,” would be six inches thick to meet the city’s stormwater management standards. This design feature was generally well-received, provided it adhered to the necessary calculations for stormwater storage.

The board also delved into architectural considerations, focusing on the building’s facade compliance with CBD design standards. Efforts were made to achieve a traditional downtown aesthetic using brick facades and vertical architectural accents. However, the design team sought a waiver from the 70% glazing requirement. Concerns were raised over the stairwell’s illumination, with suggestions to employ motion sensors to avoid excessive lighting.

Additional topics of discussion included encroachments involving adjacent properties. The board noted issues such as a window well extending over the property line and the need for coordination with the neighboring landowner to resolve these encroachments amicably. There was an emphasis on maintaining open communication with the neighboring property owner to prevent any potential conflicts.

Board members also reviewed aspects related to the project’s utility setup, affirming that the building would be fully electric, eliminating the need for gas meters. Discussions around the placement of utility meters and mailboxes, as well as the lighting plan for the garage, were addressed to ensure compliance with safety and aesthetic standards.