The Delta townhouse development proposal, set to introduce 113 residential units within a two-block area, has sparked debate among residents. Concerns were raised regarding the project’s potential to disrupt the character of Asbury Park and degrade quality of life. A long-term resident highlighted the anticipated loss of open space and increased parking challenges as significant downsides to the city’s ongoing development. The environmental implications were a focal point, particularly regarding soil contamination and stormwater management. There was apprehension that insufficient remediation efforts might lead to groundwater contamination and exacerbate flooding issues in an area already prone to such problems, like Deal Lake.

Traffic and accessibility also emerged as issues. The design of entrances and exits on Web Street, a narrow one-way road, was questioned. Residents feared the additional traffic burden would overwhelm the street, complicating navigation for both residents and construction vehicles. Concerns were compounded by the development’s alignment with existing planning principles, with references made to the Bradley Plan of 1877, which emphasized preserving ocean views and natural air flow.

The architectural design of the Delta project faced scrutiny for its deviation from the traditional aesthetic of the area. The proposed buildings’ height and massing were criticized for failing to taper down as they approached existing neighborhoods, potentially obstructing views and disrupting airflow. This design was perceived by some as inconsistent with the planned park-like setting envisioned in the North Shore design principles, with comparisons made to an “army barracks.”

Board members addressed these concerns, emphasizing the procedural constraints under which they operate. They clarified that the board’s role was to assess compliance with existing approvals rather than alter the project’s size or placement. While some members acknowledged the community’s frustrations, they stressed their duty to adhere to statutory obligations, even if the outcome was not entirely satisfactory.

The board also discussed technical aspects of the development, such as maintaining planting heights to prevent light spillage and ensuring effective stormwater management. There was agreement on measures like establishing a minimum height for wall plantings and implementing raised crosswalks to enhance pedestrian safety, although concerns about signage aesthetics remained.

Despite the contentious nature of the meeting, the board ultimately moved to approve the site plan and subdivision, citing compliance with existing regulations. The decision was met with mixed reactions from members, with some expressing reservations about the adherence to the Waterfront Redevelopment Plan. However, the majority supported the application, concluding the session with appreciation for community participation.